Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Copyrights != Fairness (Score 2) 98

There seems to be widespread misunderstanding between notions of copyright and fairness. The two are in no way synonymous.

Imagine you spend a huge amount of time and money surfacing new knowledge nobody knew before. You spill the beans in a book and sell it. Someone else comes along, reads your book and blabs what you learned to the world for free or in a much cheaper book of their own.

Imagine you painstakingly compile a phone book of numbers that would be useful to a certain niche audience. Someone takes the book, OCRs all the numbers into a computer database and gives it all away for free.

Neither of these are copyright issues, you can have the opinion they are unfair or should not be allowed yet nonetheless not a copyright concern.

Copyright holders should be careful what they wish for because an AI trained on a known dataset that can be shown to be ignorant of a copyright holders work is an affirmative defense against claims of derivative works when someone publishes the output of the AI. Before this such a defense is absurdly difficult because the author would have had to prove a negative.

Comment Re:This is a problem that should be taken seriousl (Score 1) 287

This is a problem that should be taken seriously. Our entire economy-- our entire social structure-- is built on the premise that people need to work in order to buy the essentials to stay alive. What do we do if, and when, AI and robots do all of the work, and there simply ARE no jobs for humans?

Corporations are also at risk from futuristic AI. If huge capital investments in human efforts are no longer needed increasingly anyone would be able to do "work" to command machines to do things that once required huge sums of cash and human labor to attain.

Nobody is going to pay a proverbial Microsoft for an office suite when a computer can design and implement a better product from scratch in a few weeks time.

The current paradigm is, the rich people who own the robots get all the money, and the rest of the people, who now have no jobs... what? Do they starve? What happens?

Pitchfork revolution would be my first guess.

Comment Re:Let's be honest (Score 1) 77

Likewise, every single person tech-literate enough to be on Slashdot knows this is used to store pirated media files, not your collections of homemade EDM or circa 1922 field recording.

This is pure bullshit. They really stupid thing about your comment is if you actually watched the video all it was is throwing a SBC into a plastic case, plugging it into a TV, writing a JeOS image to a 128GB SD card and copying 23 gigs of media to that SBC over a wireless LAN.

You would think by the descriptions in TFA the video was about setting up a home media server or as someone else posted installing a NAS with hundreds of terabytes of pirated films when it was no such thing.

Kodi is just a front end media player with a bunch of plugins over a 10FT UI. Its purpose is no more or less pirating than VLC, SD cards, windows file explorer or the Internet. Anyone who has used Kodi knows there are a massive array of uses for it and they know Kodi has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to facilitating piracy.

Comment Perceptions of history (Score 4, Informative) 88

"It can technically rewrite code from an old language like Perl in a new one like Python".

Both languages are from the same vintage. Python is from the early 90s and Perl late 80s. Reminiscent of persistent belief JSON is new yet XML is old.

Comment Re:I've been mocked for saying it for years (Score 1) 243

To be fair they still had to hide them in a truck and smuggle them into Russia, so they could launch from near the target airbases. They presumably had the comms equipment that linked the drones back to their control centre in those trucks too. Range is the issue, because Russia would probably notice or jam long range communications like larger drones use, and those ones were fairly small anyway.

Drones were made in Russia and Russian mobile network was used for comms.

Comment Re:Awesome! (Score 1) 243

i think you unwittingly hit the nail on the head here: the west's delusion that they're somehow superior, while they're descending into irrelevance. "we stand taller and see further", right? it just amazes me how and by what rationale you can call a whole nation "inadequate human beings"?

It's easy to call a whole nation "inadequate human beings" when their collective actions confirm the observation.

Would you also cry if someone called Nazi Germany "inadequate human beings" ... Nazi's after all friends and allies of the USSR so maybe you would.

Comment Re:Awesome! (Score 2) 243

well, hate to break it to you but it didn't. all you have is a seconds long video showing a few planes burning criculated ad nauseam and tons of headlines. russia says 4 are irrecoverable. well, let's make that 10, since only 2 airfields out of 6 planned were hit. they still have 48 more. that's not "wiping off" one leg of their nuclear triad by any stretch. plus they still have 2 more.

What Russia says is a waste of everyone's time. They lie habitually about everything. In the next day or two there will most likely be more information released and independent confirmation.

it is a tough blow, and an embarassment if you like, but it's also an embarassent for nato and the us (who, opensource stories or not, necessarily had a hand in this) for violating the strategic arms agreement that supposedly intends to avoid nuclear war and mutual destruction and was still tacitly being observed (at least by the russians).

If you want people to care about evidence free nonsense you peddle suggest first starting start with basic grammar.

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwriter.com%2Fblog%2Fcapita...

i guess now these bombers won't be in the open any more, susceptible to be monitored and watched. but it in no way "cripples" or "wipes" russia's nuclear capability, nor does it change the situation on the ground. it just makes our world more dangerous. way more dangerous. this was reckless.

Nobody is talking about wiping out nuclear capabilities. This is however significantly less airframes available to lob missiles at Ukraine. If they are lucky at any given time half of the fleet is mission ready and the other half is undergoing maintenance.

Ukrainians claim to have video footage of two A-50s being taken out ... one of which there is independent satellite imagery to support. This is also a BFD.

i reckon you guys are having a good time. by all means, enjoy!

I'm having a great time comrade.

get out that chardonnay! yolo! but careful with what you wish for, let's just all hope we all don't have to regret this ...

Appeasement of tyrants only leads to more aggression.

Comment Re:Kurzweils Singularity. (Score 5, Informative) 157

Life is WAY better after the industrial revolution than it was before it.

People have this fantasy image of what life used to be like, thinking of picturesque farms, craftsmen tinkering in workshops, clean air, etc. The middle ages were filth, you worked backbreaking labour long hours of the day, commonly in highly risky environments, even the simplest necessities cost a large portion of your salary, you lived in a hovel, and you died of preventable diseases at an average age of ~35 (a number admittedly dragged down by the fact that 1/4th of children didn't even survive a single year).

If it takes people of similar social status as you weeks of labour to produce the fibre for a set of clothes, spin it into yarn, dye it, weave it, and sew it, then guess what? It requires that plus taxes and profit weeks of your labour to be able to afford that set of clothes (and you better believe the upper classes were squeezing every ounce of profit from the lower class they could back then). Decreasing the amount of human labour needed to produce things is an immensely good thing. Furthermore, where did that freed up labour go? Into science, into medicine, into the arts, etc etc. Further improving people's quality of life.

And if your response is "But greater production is more polluting!" - I'm sorry, do you have any understanding of how *miserably* polluted cities in the middle ages were? Where coal smoke poured out with no pollution controls, sewage ran straight into rivers that people collected water from and bathed in, where people extensively used things like arsenic and mercury and lead and asbestos, etc etc? The freed-up labour brought about by the industrial revolution allowed us to *learn* and to *fix problems*.

Comment Re:No it isn't (Score 2) 157

Which of those things hit 800 million users in 17 months?
Which of those things hit such high annual recurring revenue rates so fast?
Which of those saw the cost of using the tech decline by 99% over two years?

Heck, most of them aren't even new technologies, just new products, often just the latest version of older, already-commonly-used products.

And re. that last one: it must be stressed that for the "cost of using the tech" to decline 99% over two years per million tokens, you're also talking about a similar order of reduction of power consumption per million tokens, since your two main costs are hardware and electricity.

Slashdot Top Deals

According to the latest official figures, 43% of all statistics are totally worthless.

Working...