Comment Copyrights != Fairness (Score 2) 98
There seems to be widespread misunderstanding between notions of copyright and fairness. The two are in no way synonymous.
Imagine you spend a huge amount of time and money surfacing new knowledge nobody knew before. You spill the beans in a book and sell it. Someone else comes along, reads your book and blabs what you learned to the world for free or in a much cheaper book of their own.
Imagine you painstakingly compile a phone book of numbers that would be useful to a certain niche audience. Someone takes the book, OCRs all the numbers into a computer database and gives it all away for free.
Neither of these are copyright issues, you can have the opinion they are unfair or should not be allowed yet nonetheless not a copyright concern.
Copyright holders should be careful what they wish for because an AI trained on a known dataset that can be shown to be ignorant of a copyright holders work is an affirmative defense against claims of derivative works when someone publishes the output of the AI. Before this such a defense is absurdly difficult because the author would have had to prove a negative.