We have a certain amount of freedom yes?

Your half life comment implies it's eroding.

Why can't you implement the freedom growth that came before?

Could someone tell me about cures?

I'm kind of afraid of the applications but air trafic pollution is a serious issue. I don't consider myself an environmentalist but this will produce enough savings that I'm impressed.

More Nuclear.

This is stupid, all they are is a brand and they're moving to a weaker one.

According to M$?

I read this as Right Wing Viewpoints are more extreme (different from the norm) than left wing viewpoints.

Also Bitcoin is arguably decentralized while US currency is centralized adding another risk factor.

Well said.

Politically Nuclear might be divisive because it assumes that competent, sane, dedicated people will be available and even more common over the next 30 years.

This assumption basically renders politicians redundant.

I was working on VOIP on the G1 (First Android phone) I got into ROMing, there were literally thousands of roms competing on everything from style to battery life.

All of them were better than the Google version.

I'm concerned about privacy, I've noticed things I think about or say being reflected back at me (mostly by Google) but it remains a single trajectory of harm, so is simplification, advertising, performance destroying crapware.

Please keep in mind the larger fight to have ROMS available and capable of addressing issues such as privacy.

But I also believe in European socialism.

Opera keeps getting more free why can't Firefox?

Maybe it would be nice if politicians connected with the people and took $30,000 and helped someone start a business.

Their support would mean a lot and business people who do this certainly gain confidence.

There are tonnes of great ideas out there and politicians are supposed to have hiring and efficiency skills which could be useful.

Set a good example Pelosi et. all, and help someone acheive a useful dream in an arena where your voice can still be heard. If our society is so safe it should be possible to connect with people who need money safely.

I am involved with Crypto so this is very important to me.

Savings have certainly been more secure and DeFi seems to indicate that the banks are getting rich off them.

Also I feel that a lot of people are investing in companies that they don't entirely agree with/support certainly the idea that companies are growing this rapily means that someone is getting shafted (probably the consumer).

As a liberal I support regulation as a means of curbing greed and selfishness. But as an investor I do see regulation derailing progress/innovation/efficiency. I don't think raising capital gains tax is a good idea (for example) however finding ways to involve investors in the health of the company is good. (Rich people who don't use their own products bad).

Starting a business is really cheap right now because of the low interest rates but if crypto succeeds I worry people will treat it not just as savings but as an investment.

It will certainly be interesting to see what happens in countries that adopt it. As well as the mechanisms used to surpress it in those that don't.

But they'll probably do their in/out dance. Fight it for a long time then enact it when they can get credit. Re: Slavery.