The precedent was set in an earlier case, and the precedent is that "data transfer can be considered property." That is, if Google is found to be 'stealing' data (ie, using cell phone resources that the user gets charged for), then they can be held liable for that.

The jury trial in this case found that Google was "stealing" through transferring (ie, giving the user a higher cell phone bill), but that was a question of fact determined by a jury, so it doesn't set a precedent on questions of law. There's nothing magical under the law about transferring data while the phone is idle, but the lawyers managed to convince the jury that it causes harm, and Google's lawyers failed.

This article has a lot more detail: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reuters.com%2Flegal%2F...

Sounds like a CCPA or GDPR privacy lawsuit should be coming up next, since they aren't actually deleting personal data when requested, they are only pretending to delete it.

They are working on it:
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.aerospacetestinginternational.com%2Fnews%2Fdefense%2Fus-air-force-successfully-tests-anti-missile-laser-defence-system.html%23prettyPhoto

They in fact do have the money, the population, and the inclination to go to war. The only question left is whether they can win.

The part where he claims to know what was said in secret between Netanyahu and OrangeFatMan.

It's obvious. Customers, and EU citizens, won't be able to enjoy as many auto-play videos ads.

CGI is so pervasive that this stuff doesn't even look exciting anymore. "I can look through my glasses and see an elephant turn into fireworks." Wow great.

Oh yeah? You think community ownership is what he cares about?

Usually when people say "community ownership" they mean "ownership by the community of users." That is clearly not what he means here. Although he seems to have tricked you, low-minded IQ that you are.

Yes, no doubt "community sharing" is by far the most important reason he wants to go public. It's not because he wants money, not at all.

It's well understood that the stock market understands community, and the artistic value of things other than the dollar. Fund managers are the ones you want to talk to for advice about website layout tools.

I don't know, I just asked Perplexity AI to design me a solution for a trip to Mars. It took a few back and forths, but eventually it came up with a solid solution. So I'll be sending you messages from Mars this time in 16 months. Last month I built a perpetual motion machine no cap.

This isn't hard, I don't know what everyone else's problem is. Maybe it's because they are using ChatGPT, the inferior AI. Jump into Perplexity, it will solve all your problems. I'm tired now but tomorrow I'm going to build a fusion reactor from pine needles. It's all about making the right prompt.

I can't figure out what the author wants at all. I am stupider for having read his article. His article looks like a polemic you would see in a college newspaper. For example:

ok, less hype, more results. I'm ok with that, let's set some concrete goals. What goals/results does he want? Maybe it will be an improvement over the status quo. What brilliant plan does the author have, or even mediocre idea? Nothing.

He doesn't say.

How is this?

There's been a robot soccer in this robot form factor for decades, here's an example with commentary.

Deep mind has been doing that form factor for years now, and they look decent.

Thanks

Most of America is watching Trump in the same way.