Comment Question (Score 1) 45
Should the Government Have Regulated the Early Internet - or Our Future AI?
Yes they should, as long as We The People regulate the government.
Should the Government Have Regulated the Early Internet - or Our Future AI?
Yes they should, as long as We The People regulate the government.
I wish the human race was dying out, but you DO know that there are more people in their 20s today than there was when you were in your 20s. Right?
What does the "I" stand for in "FBI"? But they can't find what?
No, you're wrong. It's not about money at all. It's about debt.
People are willing to take on jobs that require them to give up so much that life offers. They're willing to do that over growing their own food, and making their own life. Because of this basic diversion from Nature, humans are now having to put up with certain evils that they'd otherwise be protected from. Protected from such evil, by Nature itself.
Everything that I work with, all of it, it's all web based. If I want to send a message to the person on the other side of the wall from me, I use the internet to do so. Everything that I do for clients in all web based as well. When the people that work in my office have meetings, we all sit at our desks, and meet online thru MS Team. Yet the possibility of me working from home is out, because they say that they need me in the office.
At its very base, money is there to represent some form of actual value. So the paper notes themselves aren't worth anything alone. We say that "money doesn't grow on trees" because the value of money is based solely on someone working. That person works because they have a debt to pay. So the value of money is debt.
Food at its very base has its own value. Food grows freely in Nature. Nature works hard for free. The humans need only to understand this Nature machine.
So to answer the question, "What will we do?"
I don't understand what you typed.
How does the IRS verify our taxes that we submit? Ok, then just give us that software. Done. You're welcome.
"Breaking the US"
"The complete inability of society at large to NOT follow trends" is what broke the US.
...AI starts its own company, builds its own product and has a market share that eventually engulfs human ability to produce things that are worth buying?
They're all great in their own way, but the one that has the show that gets created entirely by AI, on-the-fly by listening to the user all day via their phone app, and expose how awful people are. It'll be along those lines.
The government already has it. How do you think they check your filings? So, why not just give We The People that software to use?
...do we really NEED a president? Can't we just replace that position with an AI?
...Going to an AI chatbot for a conversation and to vent about work and relationships. It's actually amazing at pointing out relevant things to focus on, and it gives a good attempt at mediating depression to some small extent. It's certainly not terrible.
"Define "average person" for me."
If you need that defined for you, you're far too ignorant to participate in the topic.
Sa-WEEEET, FINALLY!!! See, I'm from Alabama, and I've been taking shots all my life for it, "Oh are you and your sister still married?". But here we are now, knowing that the average person in Alabama is exactly the same as the average person in California. And the average African...? EXACTLY the same as the average American. When it comes to average, they're all the same, that's why they're average. Right, guys?
Honesty is for the most part less profitable than dishonesty. -- Plato