Product evolution is good.

Microsoft is in a special position of having a de facto monopoly on the desktop and with productivity software.

Using that to, at their discretion, create a tsunami of electronic waste is bad.
Using that to, at their discretion, extract more time and money from people, is bad.

It's like a tax increase, but paid to private companies.

Here's a breakdown of what Cash For Clunkers scrapped: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thedrive.com%2Fnews%2Fheres-the-full-list-of-all-677081-cars-killed-in-cash-for-clunkers

Oh give me a break. For starters, nobody's PC is going to stop working. Every Windows 10 PC out there will operate exactly the same on October 15th as they did the day before.

The problem is not that they will "stop working", the problem is that they cannot be upgraded to the next version of Windows, due to a Microsoft decree. If they wish to receive security patches, they are out of luck if they decide to continue using the hardware.

Anyone throwing their PC in the trash to upgrade to Windows 11 (or 12) is the person generating the waste. Those PCs could be repurposed to run Linux quite easily. Just wipe 'em and toss 'em on Ebay. Nobody has to throw their machine in the garbage. That's a conscious decision on the part of the user / owner.

The problem is also that Microsoft is decreeing those PC's can no longer be used securely.

The "just wipe and install Linux" or "toss 'em on Ebay" again underscores the fact that the devices cannot be upgraded and must be junked in some way, due to a Microsoft decree.

It's astonishing one company could generate this amount of electronic waste.

But, if you have a de facto monopoly on the desktop and the the productivity software (i.e. Office), it's basically like a government decree stating you have to trash those PCs.

It's like the "Cash For Clunkers" program, where the government destroyed 10s of thousands of perfectly usable vehicles (driving up the cost of used vehicles), except there's no cash being given to the affected people, and the computers aren't going to be recycled.

This phrase from the summary caught my eye: "Studies indicate generative AI could automate 30-40% of junior developer and tester tasks." This society better start developing young people and the lower skill tiers if they want that cream that it yields, the cream that drives technology and society. Cream does not automatically appear without regular milk.

If a society decides to prey on its young people instead of developing them, it is setting itself up for decline. The education bubble is a big deal. I remember watching the costs of books and classes skyrocket after the year 2000. The first housing bubble was starting around that time. These are two things that disproportionately harm young people.

The phrase "eating your seed corn" refers to farmers consuming corn seed instead of saving it to plant for next year. That appears to be what's happening over the past 20-some years. Consolidating wealth in the already successful, making it harder for lower skill and financial tiers to build themselves up.

I think it explains the whipsaw politics as well, as people cast votes for more and more nontraditional candidates.

Therefore they did not view Hiroshima and Nagasaki much different than other bombed cities. What really convinced them to surrender was that the USSR had invaded the largely undefended north, and with very rapid progress.

Quite a coincidence then, that the Japanese surrendered four days after the 6 August Nagasaki bombing, if the bombings had little or nothing to do with their decision.

Any public service that can be privatized and profited-from, they seek to privatize. Regulations that hinder profit, are being eliminated. Good for the business-owner class, not so much for the consumer.

"If money is speech, the wealthy have a lot more of it than you."

I think Citizens United was a disastrous decision. Instead of saying only physical persons could contribute to politicians, they went the opposite direction and said any logical construct, union or business, could contribute. Perhaps it was consistent with existing law but it really empowered the donor class to the detriment of the rest of the population. It's creating stresses in society. And both sides cowtow to money and moneyed interests.

In democratic societies, power has a tendency to coalesce to the center of power, to consolidate. A dictatorship is the ultimate form. Feudalism is an intermediate form. If it's not resisted, democracy becomes hollowed out, and we return to de facto oligarchy and feudalism.

Hitler was no spectacular physical specimen. More like a sickly little wimp.

The joke was, "The perfect Aryan man is blond like Hitler, slim like Goering, beautiful like Goebbels."

The big question is, "What exactly did the black box record?"
Was it the physical position of the switches?
Or the electronic status of the fuel run-cutoff state?

I haven't heard a definitive answer. Mostly, I'm seeing the question begged, assuming the physical positions of the switches was what was recorded.

There is a tremendous amount of existing code. Many times I've had to debug or enhance existing code. Reading code is hard. If no one is taught to program, and everyone is relying on code snippets from an LLM, that code is not going to be maintained and will slowly degrade.

Writing new code - you need to know data structures and algorithms for anything more than the highest level scripting. If you feed an LLM all the code on the planet, you still have to understand what it's returning in order to debug it.

If the LLM is going to generate new code, the programmer has to read it (hard - someone else's code and data structures and algorithms) and understand it before deploying.

I don't see how any of this is going to remove the need for programming and programmers. LLM's are amazing, they are natural language databases. They are productivity enhancers, but not replacements for people doing the querying.

If eradicating these flies is acceptable, why not mosquitos? There are certainly ecosystem impacts from removing the flies, the question it seems to me is, "Are they acceptable?" Apparently yes. How did they arrive at these conclusions - just test it and see? Or was the benefit worth whatever the costs to the ecosystem?

Spawning cults and driving people into psychosis is a strong pass of the Turing Test.

That's my big use case, and I think a lot of people's. Also, a good PDF editor. Notepad (I know Notepad++ works on Linux but notepad is as simple and quick as it gets).

If MSOffice could run seamlessly on Linux, that would seriously accelerate Linux desktop adoption.

Also, automatic OS updates would be big.