Comment Re:Not Flock (Score 1) 121
So far so good? Surely the camera must have given this cop an image of the car that he could see was the wrong colour. It should never have got as far as her apartment.
So far so good? Surely the camera must have given this cop an image of the car that he could see was the wrong colour. It should never have got as far as her apartment.
Huawei was targeted because it was an R&D powerhouse, and all it did was make them redouble their efforts. Sanctions can't do much about patents because if they tried, it would just make other countries invalidate US patents in response.
Apple charges $300 for an additional 512GB of SSD storage on a Macbook Air. So that 12GB is worth $7.
If it's the hidden nature of the camera that you have an issue with, button and other wearable, concealed cameras have been available for years too.
On a laptop? Unless you want the other drive trailing around by its USB cable that is not an option.
Keep in mind that Tightwad Tim [Cook] kept 256 GB storage the base spec for a long time. In fact the brand new M6 Mac mini Still Ships With 256 GB, as does the Neo.
One other note, multiple people reported that the actual AI storage is 25 to 30 GB.
The point you missed is that I don't want AI at all.
Burning targets are not allowed at my range.
"I've yet to see a report where the AI was malicious. Injurious, perhaps, but that's different.
In everything I've seen, the AI was acting to achieve the task it had been set. It wasn't very good at counting the costs to anyone, and was pretty much ignorant of any costs to anyone else. But it was willing to sacrifice its own existence to accomplish the task it had been given. Malice is an incorrect reading."
So how to you classify a dog running out into the street and attacking you? Malicious or not? Note the pedestrian did nothing to provoke the dog.
Tschernobyl blew up, no shutting down. TMI melted its core. Fukushima melted its core. Windscale had a burning graphite core. You were saying? Oh, right, you just claimed total crap.
says ChatGPT went on to say that "assuming each shell results in one hit, you might down 10 to 20 people max, depending on spacing, density, reaction times, and chaos."
Why is it so easy to ask ChatGPT how best to kill people? That's AI Validation 101 stuff. Maybe run ChatGPT through CaptainObviousGPT first? WTF
Well, true. But that's not an excuse to keep repeating the same mistakes.
Should have made Web BASIC.
Matter cannot be created or destroyed, nor can it be returned without a receipt.