They aren't writing it, Claude is.

The AI isn't thinking. It's just predicting what looks most like it fits, when the choice is diddled with random numbers. That's the difference: humans are doing something more profound than rolling a die to decide which of the possible next things should actually come next.

Jerking off is a better use of time than this, especially once you know this is his third attempt.

Doing it right is asking whether you want it installed, not forcing it on you.

Were you in a frat at Cornell or what?

What a fucking lame ass pack of bullshit false equivalences between the bullshit things that aren't happening that you're scared of and actual things that matter.

We know what he said. He said that we had to accept some gun deaths so we could have the second amendment. He also said "gurgle" and "ack" when that came home. Literally nothing else he said on the subject is of any interest.

Some of us are smart enough to see what he is from his actions and public statements. He's not trying to hide what he is, or if he is, he's such an alien that he has no idea what that entails.

Same. When I install Linux I do a minimal install and then add only what I want. I am usually doing something weird on install so this is frequently the only way that makes sense.

The headline is reasonable if we all agree that AI gives us something worth the down sides. We do not.

Few outside the billionaires of Silicon Valley actually believe the hype. The average Joe is largely annoyed when their favorite productivity tools suddenly have "Smarter Clippy" shoehorned in. Or talk with some of AI's heaviest users (programmers) and you'll hear a pretty common theme: "Wow, Claude makes it easy to hit my Q3 targets, bummer it's going to put us all out of work (or far, far worse) five years from now."

Free software isn't about killing kittens, it's about the users of the kitten killing software.

Linus' pragmatism about licenses is misplaced because Linux would not have succeeded under a different license.

True. We should have hanged every last slave owner. Those would have been ends worth fighting for.

He was paid to think, but not very hard.

If you think very hard then you stop being a cop

That's true, but a) that's crappy and b) they used to offer more, and the actually good OSes used to offer a lot more and still do. Unixes and Unixlikes other than OSX still generally allow you to install pretty small subsets of the OS.

You claim you can read but you still wrote that after reading my comment. Are you a bot? No, wait, even a bot wouldn't have come to that conclusion about what I wrote, which was about the opposite of what you pretended it was about so that you could pretend to have a valid argument, as usual.

Yeah, let me just step out of my car and listen to this report on where I'm supposed to drive while I'm on the highway with thousands of other people, you fucking muppet.

You're conflating your unrealistic bullshit with a valid argument.

Again, you are a fucking muppet, we already have laws like that. For example the laws which have protected access to POTS phones for people in remote locations which the telcos are now trying to get out of despite the obvious public safety interest so they can save a dollar. And that is exactly like the automakers taking away AM radio on a specious basis because they want to save a few dollars per vehicle. Fuck them and fuck your disingeuous corporate cocksucking behavior. It's embarrassing to see you do it every time.

You cannot argue that without arguing that she is mentally incompetent to make legal arrangements and should therefore be under conservatorship. She agreed that the operators of the service would review her input and would comply with the law.