Comment Re:Unemployed + Underemployed (Score 1) 123
Why restrict that to just graduates?
The original article was comparing recent college graduates to the population as a whole.
Why restrict that to just graduates?
The original article was comparing recent college graduates to the population as a whole.
"And today's forecast is a high somewhere in the 80s, maybe 70s or 90s, check back around 6PM for more details.
Oh, and it just might rain. Maybe."
I'd like to see the same data after factoring in underemployment.
How many recent grads were doing what they considered "temporary, until I get a real job" work in the 12 months after graduation for Spring 2024 graduates? Compare that number + unemployment across the years going back a few decades and show me the chart.
Do the same for "still looking for a real job, even if I have a temp gig lined up" for Spring 2025 graduates and compare that to graduates for the past few decades who were "still looking" around the time that they graduated.
Every time I see or hear an updated weather report, I know my tax dollars are at work.
Is he going into deep dementia now?
Are you suggesting he wasn't there already?
Um, nope.
We are neurodivergent, but in divergent ways.
and theres probably a total of three people
That many?
Unless you broaden "typical/average" enough, most people are height-divergent too.
How far do you want to zoom in or zoom out from average (assuming a mostly-bell-curve distribution) when declaring what is and is not "typical?"
How many people are within a few millimeters of the average/typical height for their country? How many are +/- a few decimeters?
Granted, test scores on autism, dyslexia, ADHD, etc, don't follow a bell curve, but the point is similar: Unless the particular measurement has a clear-cut "valley" where everyone on one side of the valley can be considered "typical" and everyone on the other can be considered "atypical," where you "draw the line" can be arbitrary. Even where there is a "valley" there is still a judgment call on whether to call the people who score "higher than clearly typical, lower than clearly atypical" typical or atypical.
borrowed funds? If not, the ban will have limited effect because money is fungible.
Now, it will prevent someone with a net worth, say, of GBP100,000 from buying GBP200,000 worth of whatever-coin, but it won't stop them from spending everything they have on whatever-coin and putting their living expenses on a credit card.
The UK has no predators that can take down an adult hog.
Legend has it that a young man weilding a book of Aristotle took down a wild boar back in the day.
Maybe it was a juvenile boar?
Mmmm, genetically modified bacon, mmmmmm.
If you want car taxes to pay for road maintenance, ditch fuel taxes and harge by the mile or pound-mile, not per car.
If you want car taxes to pay for pollution, charge all polluting energy sources based on the pollution they produce. Electric car owners will think they are paying nothing, but if they are using polluting sources for their power, they will pay.
If are charging for general revenue, charging by the car when it's first sold and/or every year make sense, it's easy to enforce.
Either way, ditch taxes that are specific to "motor vehicle fuels" - they are no longer fair.
"I have just one word for you, my boy...plastics." - from "The Graduate"