Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
Transportation

Class Action Accuses Toyota of Illegally Sharing Drivers' Data (insurancejournal.com) 51

Posted by EditorDavid from the you'll-never-drive-alone dept.
"A federal class action lawsuit filed this week in Texas accused Toyota and an affiliated telematics aggregator of unlawfully collecting drivers' information and then selling that data to Progressive," reports Insurance Journal: The lawsuit alleges that Toyota and Connected Analytic Services (CAS) collected vast amounts of vehicle data, including location, speed, direction, braking and swerving/cornering events, and then shared that information with Progressive's Snapshot data sharing program. The class action seeks an award of damages, including actual, nominal, consequential damages, and punitive, and an order prohibiting further collection of drivers' location and vehicle data.
Florida man Philip Siefke had bought a new Toyota RAV4 XLE in 2021 "equipped with a telematics device that can track and collect driving data," according to the article. But when he tried to sign up for insurance from Progressive, "a background pop-up window appeared, notifying Siefke that Progressive was already in possession of his driving data, the lawsuit says. A Progressive customer service representative explained to Siefke over the phone that the carrier had obtained his driving data from tracking technology installed in his RAV4." (Toyota told him later he'd unknowingly signed up for a "trial" of the data sharing, and had failed to opt out.) The lawsuit alleges Toyota never provided Siefke with any sort of notice that the car manufacture would share his driving data with third parties... The lawsuit says class members suffered actual injury from having their driving data collected and sold to third parties including, but not limited to, damage to and diminution in the value of their driving data, violation of their privacy rights, [and] the likelihood of future theft of their driving data.
The telemetry device "can reportedly gather information about location, fuel levels, the odometer, speed, tire pressure, window status, and seatbelt status," notes CarScoop.com. "In January, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton started an investigation into Toyota, Ford, Hyundai, and FCA..." According to plaintiff Philip Siefke from Eagle Lake, Florida, Toyota, Progressive, and Connected Analytic Services collect data that can contribute to a "potential discount" on the auto insurance of owners. However, it can also cause insurance premiums to be jacked up.
The plaintiff's lawyer issued a press release: Despite Toyota claiming it does not share data without the express consent of customers, Toyota may have unknowingly signed up customers for "trials" of sharing customer driving data without providing any sort of notice to them. Moreover, according to the lawsuit, Toyota represented through its app that it was not collecting customer data even though it was, in fact, gathering and selling customer information. We are actively investigating whether Toyota, CAS, or related entities may have violated state and federal laws by selling this highly sensitive data without adequate disclosure or consent...

If you purchased a Toyota vehicle and have since seen your auto insurance rates increase (or been denied coverage), or have reason to believe your driving data has been sold, please contact us today or visit our website at classactionlawyers.com/toyota-tracking.
On his YouTube channel, consumer protection attorney Steve Lehto shared a related experience he had — before realizing he wasn't alone. "I've heard that story from so many people who said 'Yeah, I I bought a brand new car and the salesman was showing me how to set everything up, and during the setup process he clicked Yes on something.' Who knows what you just clicked on?!"

Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader sinij for sharing the news.

Comment Re:Good for California (Score 1) 56

I think he has you here. Google/Alphabet IS a California based company. Fact is that Non-compete clauses have been unenforceable in CA for decades! The only exception is if you are a principal in a company and sell the company. Knew a guy who sold out to Synopsys. He had a 3 year non-compete as part of the sale contract. That is the only exception I'm aware of.

Comment Re:Reinventing the wheel, again... (Score 1) 98

by Shag (#65213701) Attached to: Could New Clocks Keep Airplanes Safe From GPS Jamming?

Inertial navigation isn't accurate enough for long distance navigation

Of course it was. It was used by the jets to cross the atlantic and pacific. It was a perfectly cromelent system.

Jets?

In early 1953, the government convened a meeting of researchers in Los Angeles to discuss the possibility of inertial navigation.
"Doc" Draper and his MIT team stuck their prototype INS unit in a B-29, but had no time to test it before flying non-stop from outside Boston.
After 2,500 miles of flying with no input from the pilots, it was only 10 miles off.
Draper went to the meeting and said that yeah, it was possible, since he'd just done it.
I feel sorry for whatever presentater followed him.

Comment Re:Whoa (Score 1) 48

by Shag (#65212555) Attached to: TCL Overtakes LG To Become Second-largest Premium TV Brand

I saw this headline before any comments and thought "wait, didn't Walmart just recently announce plans to outright buy one of the brands whose TVs they sell?" So I checked and they did, but that was Vizio, not TCL, so I decided to let it lie rather than being the first commenter. But yes, certainly, TCL is a brand I associate with Walmart.

Comment Re: Mmm, geodata... (Score 3, Informative) 14

by Shag (#65179017) Attached to: 'Pokemon Go' Maker Nears $3.5 Billion Deal To Sell Games Unit

Yeah, John Hanke spent a few years in the foreign service, then after B-school founded a company that visualized geospatial data, "Keyhole," which had the CIA's venture arm In-Q-Tel as a funder. Google bought it, and it turned into Google Earth and Google Maps.

And it's not just data on where phones go (and don't - "holes" in traffic patterns can indicate restricted areas) -- there's also databases with a ton of coordinates for various places and things, and more recently with 3-d data on them from players "scanning" them.
AI

DeepSeek IOS App Sends Data Unencrypted To ByteDance-Controlled Servers (arstechnica.com) 68

Posted by EditorDavid from the you-hear-that-mr-anderson dept.
An anonymous Slashdot reader quotes a new article from Ars Technica: On Thursday, mobile security company NowSecure reported that [DeepSeek] sends sensitive data over unencrypted channels, making the data readable to anyone who can monitor the traffic. More sophisticated attackers could also tamper with the data while it's in transit. Apple strongly encourages iPhone and iPad developers to enforce encryption of data sent over the wire using ATS (App Transport Security). For unknown reasons, that protection is globally disabled in the app, NowSecure said. What's more, the data is sent to servers that are controlled by ByteDance, the Chinese company that owns TikTok...

[DeepSeek] is "not equipped or willing to provide basic security protections of your data and identity," NowSecure co-founder Andrew Hoog told Ars. "There are fundamental security practices that are not being observed, either intentionally or unintentionally. In the end, it puts your and your company's data and identity at risk...." This data, along with a mix of other encrypted information, is sent to DeepSeek over infrastructure provided by Volcengine a cloud platform developed by ByteDance. While the IP address the app connects to geo-locates to the US and is owned by US-based telecom Level 3 Communications, the DeepSeek privacy policy makes clear that the company "store[s] the data we collect in secure servers located in the People's Republic of China...."

US lawmakers began pushing to immediately ban DeepSeek from all government devices, citing national security concerns that the Chinese Communist Party may have built a backdoor into the service to access Americans' sensitive private data. If passed, DeepSeek could be banned within 60 days.

Comment Right-to-Repair (Score 1) 47

by Shag (#65124127) Attached to: Software Flaw Exposes Millions of Subarus, Rivers of Driver Data

Subaru is among the companies that wailed and gnashed their teeth when Massachusetts (and perhaps other states) passed laws saying that yes, right-to-repair does extend to cars, even cars with fancy computerized gewgaws, and manufacturers need to make those features accessible to independent shops to the point that they can repair them.

Subaru's solution was to simply disable those features on cars it sold in/around Massachusetts, if I recall. It and other manufacturers complained loudly that making things accessible to repair shops would also make them vulnerable to hackers and so on.

This article sure sounds like they were vulnerable enough to begin with.

I'm glad my Subaru is too old to have any of this stuff.

Comment More independent competition, less consolidation (Score 1) 170

by Shag (#65108497) Attached to: 'Decentralized Social Media Is the Only Alternative To the Tech Oligarchy'

Part of the problem is rich folks who own one site and make a killing off it buying up other sites, launching features to compete with other rich folks' sites, etc.

Did Facebook buying WhatsApp and Instagram actually make things better for consumers? Probably not. Did launching Threads to compete with Twitter? Not as much as BlueSky did. Does people who own rocket companies buying media companies make the world better? Probably not.

I get more value from reading Slashdot, Fark and Quora than I do from all Meta sites combined.

In an era where all my devices will cheerily generate unique strong passwords for every site, there's just not that much upside to having 3 or 4 social media services owned by the same company.

The one sale of a social media site that I'm not sure made things measurably worse would be Microsoft's acquisition of LinkedIn. I mean, sure, maybe they'll eventually embrace, extend and extinguish it, but they haven't found the time yet, and although it "aligns" with their image of making products for professionals, it's not integrated with or bound to any of those products, and has its own differentiated niche.

Submission + - Walmart Sued Over Illegally Opening Bank Accounts For Delivery Drivers (theverge.com)

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes: The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is suing Walmart and payroll service provider Branch Messenger for alleged illegal payment practices for gig workers. The bureau says Walmart was opening direct deposit accounts using Spark delivery drivers’ social security numbers without their consent. The accounts also can come with intense fees that, according to the complaint, would add either 2 percent or $2.99 per transaction, whichever is higher. It also says Walmart repeatedly promised to provide drivers with same-day payments through the platform starting in July 2021 but never delivered on that.

The Bureau alleges that for approximately two years starting around June 2021, defendants engaged in unfair, abusive, and deceptive practices in violation of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010, including by requiring Spark Drivers to receive their compensation in Branch Accounts, opening Branch Accounts for Spark Drivers without their informed consent or, in many instances, on an unauthorized basis, and making deceptive statements about Branch to Spark Drivers. Spark delivery workers have been complaining about Walmart’s Branch Messenger account requirements for years, which forced workers to use these accounts with no option to direct deposit to a preferred credit union or local bank. Walmart allegedly told workers they’d be terminated if they didn’t accept the Branch accounts.
Medicine

Hydroxychloroquine-Promoting COVID Study Retracted After 4 Years (nature.com) 110

Posted by EditorDavid from the following-the-science dept.
Nature magazine reports that "A study that stoked enthusiasm for the now-disproven idea that a cheap malaria drug can treat COVID-19 has been retracted — more than four-and-a-half years after it was published." Researchers had critiqued the controversial paper many times, raising concerns about its data quality and an unclear ethics-approval process. Its eventual withdrawal, on the grounds of concerns over ethical approval and doubts about the conduct of the research, marks the 28th retraction for co-author Didier Raoult, a French microbiologist, formerly at Marseille's Hospital-University Institute Mediterranean Infection (IHU), who shot to global prominence in the pandemic. French investigations found that he and the IHU had violated ethics-approval protocols in numerous studies, and Raoult has now retired.

The paper, which has received almost 3,400 citations according to the Web of Science database, is the highest-cited paper on COVID-19 to be retracted, and the second-most-cited retracted paper of any kind....

Because it contributed so much to the HCQ hype, "the most important unintended effect of this study was to partially side-track and slow down the development of anti-COVID-19 drugs at a time when the need for effective treatments was critical", says Ole Søgaard, an infectious-disease physician at Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark, who was not involved with the work or its critiques. "The study was clearly hastily conducted and did not adhere to common scientific and ethical standards...."

Three of the study's co-authors had asked to have their names removed from the paper, saying they had doubts about its methods, the retraction notice said.
Nature includes this quote from a scientific-integrity consultant in San Francisco, California. "This paper should never have been published — or it should have been retracted immediately after its publication."

"The report caught the eye of the celebrity doctor Mehmet Oz," the Atlantic reported in April of 2020 (also noting that co-author Raoult "has made news in recent years as a pan-disciplinary provocateur; he has questioned climate change and Darwinian evolution...")

And Nature points out that while the study claimed good results for the 20 patients treated with HCQ, six more HCQ-treated people in the study actually dropped out before it was finished. And of those six people, one died, while three more "were transferred to an intensive-care unit."

Thanks to Slashdot reader backslashdot for sharing the news.

Slashdot Top Deals

The system was down for backups from 5am to 10am last Saturday.

Close