Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:A good step, but... (Score 1) 31

Sure, go far back enough (and yes, I was on computers at that time) but surely he's not saying, "Man, computers were better when you could only run one process at a time, and the operating system let you do literally anything" etc etc and if so, the answer to that is, you can still do that if you want .. you just can't do it *inside* somebody else's software architecture. You still own the hardware, do whatever you want.

Comment Re:A good step, but... (Score 1) 31

huh? it's trivial to write any code you want and run it on your phone

But with respect to your "dawn of the PC era", unless you wrote the operating system, you couldn't write and run code that could do anything and everything your computer was capable of - only code that could do what the operating system would permit you to do.

That's no different today.

Comment Re:I'm sure AI is great (Score 1) 100

Nah. The problem here is that the studies I've seen suggest skills atrophy when people become reliant on AI. So the likelihood is that Torvalds will, ultimately, deteriorate to that junior software dev you intensely dislike.\

The good news though is that if you're a C programmer, then even if you're the kind of C programmer who thinks Rust isn't necessary because only stupid C programmers make mistakes, unlike you, you're perfect (etc, you've seen the type, and would not touch a line of their code), you will probably be a better C programmer than Linux Torvalds within a year or two.

Alas, it won't be because you're any better at C programming.

Comment Re:training on your data (Score 4, Insightful) 226

Have you considered though the possibility that some of the smartest computer scientists in the world might also be incredibly stupid. I mean, this is the impression I'm increasingly getting as people who know how the fucking technology works insist that they're found the solution to sentience and it's... word prediction algorithms.
 

Comment Re:Whatever (Score 2) 58

Mediocrity has worked for them since the late 2000s, as it has for companies from Microsoft to MacDonalds. Google once had a decent search engine, and Apple a decent set of personal computers, but both at some point said "Fuck it, let's be sub-mediocre" and lost virtually no market share. Mediocrity is where it's at, why change now?

Comment Re:Canonical's expertise is not anti-DDOS (Score 1) 12

It seems to boil down to "They valued their user's privacy and so refused to use a company that funnels some ungodly portion of the Internet, decrypting and the re-encrypting it, through its servers."

Just because a "solution" to a problem exists doesn't make it appropriate or better than nothing "CommunityMember".

Comment Re:I'm a fan of Bond films (Score 4, Funny) 51

"So Goldfinger, I suppose you expect me to talk"

"Good catch! You're absolutely right. You're right to push back, I am not expecting you to talk. There are several reasons I can't expect you to talk:

1. You're well known as a spy who is uncorruptable and has been threatened by far worse than a laser table.
2. You would likely spend the time trying to escape, rather than answering my question.
3. I would not be able to trust any answer you give anyway, because you would be seconds away from death while it would take much longer for me to determine if your answers are true.

In fact, I expect you to die. You not being alive any more would solve several issues, such as preventing you from interfering with my plans in future, or killing me by shooting out a window in a plane causing me to be sucked out into the air.

Would you like to ask me how to escape from the laser table, or how to find Pussy Galore's phone number?

Slashdot Top Deals

You will have many recoverable tape errors.

Working...