
Xerox Buys Lexmark For $1.5 Billion As Print Industry Clings To Relevance (nerds.xyz) 26
BrianFagioli shares a report from NERDS.xyz: In a move that feels straight out of a different era, Xerox has officially acquired Lexmark for $1.5 billion. The deal includes net debt and assumed liabilities, and it pulls Lexmark out of the hands of Chinese ownership and into a freshly restructured Xerox. That's a lot of money for a company best known for making machines that spit out paper.
According to Xerox, this is all part of a "Reinvention" strategy. The company now claims it will be one of the top five players in every major print category and the leader in managed print services. [...] Xerox says the new leadership team will include executives from both sides, and the combined business will now support over 200,000 clients in more than 170 countries. They'll also be running 125 manufacturing and distribution centers in 16 countries.
According to Xerox, this is all part of a "Reinvention" strategy. The company now claims it will be one of the top five players in every major print category and the leader in managed print services. [...] Xerox says the new leadership team will include executives from both sides, and the combined business will now support over 200,000 clients in more than 170 countries. They'll also be running 125 manufacturing and distribution centers in 16 countries.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
In what way are they a scam? The user buys printer, hits print, and a print comes out? Are you not using English words correctly?
Re: Lexmark (Score:1, Informative)
The consumer grade stuff has tiny ink tanks packed inside of drm'd cartridges. The machine is sold at a loss and all of the profit is in selling the vendor-locked consumables at a markup.
All the big names are like that and have been since the 90s when "consumer grade computer printer" became a market.
Office/commercial grade stuff is less bad. I have some sort of ink tank printer downstairs that takes actual liquid ink that lasts longer and isn't as marked up.
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed they do, that doesn't make it a scam. The printer still does what it says on the box. Use English words correctly. My razor is a loss leader, does that mean it's a scam that I was able to shave this morning?
There are many words to describe what you're saying, but scam isn't the correct one. The printers objectively do what you pay them to do.
Re:Lexmark (Score:4)
Their inkjets may be junque but their big enterprise printers are amazing pieces of engineering. Bulletproof, built to print hundreds of thousands of pages per month without skipping a beat.
Re:Lexmark (Score:5, Insightful)
They're another scam inkjet company. Why do people keep falling for this, over and over again?
They stoped selling inkjets in 2012... It seems they live in your head rent free.
Re: (Score:3)
They're another scam inkjet company. Why do people keep falling for this, over and over again?
They stoped selling inkjets in 2012... It seems they live in your head rent free.
To be fair, anyone who had to deal with inkjets in the 90s and 00s will have long memories about them... long, painful, traumatic memories.
Excuse me, I need to call my therapist, "yes, I had the flashback again, the one with the HP".
I print more than you'd think given the times (Score:4, Insightful)
The kiddos like their coloring pages. And a printed chore chart is a lot neater than a hand-written one on a whiteboard.
At work there's still the need to print out a slide deck and lay it out on a big table to mark up with a red pen before briefing it to a bigwig.
I understand that typed and printed homework is still a thing and might be around when the kids are old enough for that to be relevant.
Not all contractors are online. The bigger ones are but a few small ones still need contracts and such signed on paper. Building permits too now that I think of it.
Paper isn't going to disappear anytime soon.
Re: I print more than you'd think given the times (Score:3)
how else would you print something for safekeeping and then lose that or file it then never refer to it again?
I have clients that still think like that.
Re: (Score:2)
Back in the early 2000s (Score:2)
Re: Back in the early 2000s (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
I don't think they were ever an upstart, wasn't Lexmark just the spinoff of IBMs printing business?
Lesxmark was the Spinoff of IBM's PERIPHERAL's business, and included amazing things like the M2 buckling spring keyboards. Then they specialized in printers. Having said that, their printer's division was small an scrapy in comparison with Canon, epson and HP
Re: (Score:2)
I wondered if Xerox would get the keyboards but apparently Unicomp bought buckling spring from Lexmark in 1996 and now sells New Model M with buckling spring tech. Also a Mac version.. hmm wonder how it compares to keychron / MX keys?
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.igorslab.de%2Fen%2Funi... [igorslab.de]
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pckeyboard.com%2Fpag... [pckeyboard.com]
Re:Back in the early 2000s (Score:5, Insightful)
An upstart they never were - they're a spinoff of IBM. The company entered the world with a large blue spoon in its mouth. From IBM, Lexmark inherited a ton of government contracts and did quite nicely, thankyouverymuch.
You know AI is going to hit (Score:3, Interesting)
There is a shitload of people who just make documents out of documents and move them up to chain so that information can be summarized and the CEO can decide what he wants to do next.
All of that is going to be done by AI pretty soon. You might have one or two data scientists programming the AI but the reams of people who had the job of taking the data scientists ugly data and making it pretty for a CEO that scraped by on a "gentleman c" is definitely going to get taken by ai and there's no way in hell those are going to be printed.
Re: (Score:1)
That's a stupid fucking take. They indeed briefly had the keyboard division (before that was bought by Unicomp) but those keyboards were made using the same machines and tooling as when they were owned by IBM. In fact, early on (this was around 1997 when I bought mine), they still had the IBM logos on the housing. The only difference was, they went back to the detachable cord design (later iterations of the Model M, when made by IBM, had non-detachable cords). I was given the choice of an AT or PS/2 connect
Re: (Score:2)
I also had one of their laser printers, Optra-something-something -- it was 1200 dpi when HP was nowhere near that, fucking fast (yeah, hilarious how the MCU in the laser printer was a gazillion times faster than the 286 in my machine) and it had Postscript 2 support, very cool to write postscript programs that ran on the machine and spit out the results on paper.
While in the uni, a friend was part of the bio-electronics group, they had a super-fast printer, connected to a 286 running OS/2 2.1 acting as a print server for the whole group. You made me remember. Fun times.
Re: (Score:1)
"I never associated Lexmark with printers"
WTAF??
I've been in this business 43+ years (Score:3, Interesting)
This is not your dad's Lexmark or my dad's Xerox (Score:2)
Xerox mostly operates in Enterprise printing now, and believe you me, campanies still print a lot. Lexmark operates both in consumer and entreprise printing, so a bunch of new customers for xerox.
The newly joined company will probably be able to do a best of breed product roadmap in HW and SW going forward.
Also, I do not know, and I am to lazy to ask, but there may be geography complimentarities (i.e. markets were Xerox is tronger but lexmark was weaker and Vice versa), that would allow a best of breed appr