The Switch 2 pricing was announced well after Trump was elected, and undoubtedly included *some* additional markup for tariff increases from the get go, since he had been talking about tariffs the whole campaign, even if it has been a continual game of roulette trying to predict the *exact* tariffs. So it makes sense that the Switch 1 prices would be more sensitive to the tariffs than the Switch 2.

You mean the JFK documents that were released containing hundreds of social security numbers of federal employees? Not exactly a glowing recommendation.

Wow, you really can't even continue reading once sentence after the one that triggers you.

Everything you said is true for an individual, but misses the point the parent was making regarding the total number of charging stations needed.

If an EV needs to charge 20 minutes every 200 miles, and an ICE vehicle needs to pump gas for 5 minutes every 200 miles, then you will need 4 times the number of public level 3 chargers as gas pumps to serve the same number of cars. In fact if roadtripping EVs are mostly charging at normal meal breaks, then you will need even more chargers, since use will be more clustered compared to gas stops.

On the flip side, the public chargers will only be used by people on road trips or who don't have a home charger which will decrease their volume. Still I would expect you to need more chargers than gas pumps along highways, and fewer in the middle of cities.

They wrote this software for free, and they gave you for free security updates that don't require accepting any new features. They even went out of their way to continue putting out security releases (ESR 115.13) for operating systems that Microsoft and Apple don't even support anymore. And they did this all six months in advance so you would have plenty of time to upgrade.

But enjoy your freedom to run old unpatched software.

In many ways I like the Lyttle Lytton contest even more. There were some very good Bulwer-Lytton entries, but it could also devolve into who could write the longest run-on sentence. Having a short word limit forced authors to really distill their horribleness.

If you take a book, reproduce it exactly, and add commentary at the end, the resulting work is a derivative work and you need permission of the original copyright holder to distribute it. FSF has only granted permission to use the AGPL exactly as it is with no modification or additions, so Neo4j had no permission to use their modified version of the AGPL, and doing so was violating FSF's copyright.

The Fed wants to keep the details secret and vary them frequently so the banks aren't over optimizing to the test. This makes senset, for example with standardized crash testing it is common for cars to perform great on the exact crash scenario tested for, but poorly on off-nominal crash scenarios that occur in the real world.

On the other hand, secret laws and regulations are antithesis to free society because how can you justly expect anyone to follow rules when you won't tell them what the rules are. And since the banks are required to modify their behavior if they fail these tests, then the tests are effectively regulations.

A fair solution would be to have the test published ahead of time, but still change frequently adapting to what the Fed perceives as gaming of the test. The problem is that going through the normal regulation process with comment periods and such takes a good two years at least, and the Fed would like to move faster than that.

I really wanted cryptocurrency to work out. There is such a need for digital cash that lets people pay for things online without credit card companies charging exorbitant processing fees and then on top of that tracking every transaction and selling your purchase history to anyone willing pay. In addition to making existing purchases better, I thought cryptocurrency had a chance of becoming Clay Shirky's micropayments, enabling business models that can't exist now. Reading about far away lands (SV) where there were actually bitcoin ATMs in bars, it sounded like the future was almost on us.

Instead it turned out worse than credit cards or even paypal in every way. Your purchase history isn't anonymous. It is at best pseudonymous but easily traceable if you use it as widely as you you would a credit card, and thus effectively public unless you go to great lengths to obscure it. Processing fees are higher than credit cards. And it requires insane resources to operate that would make the most inefficient monopolist bureaucracy blush in embarrassment. It is completely useless as a normal day-to-day currency.

Then to make matters worse, it attracted a huge number of grifters, conmen, speculators, and criminals who are its only real users.

Etherium is at least trying to work towards being useful as a day-to-day payment method. It has been slow progress, and I don't know if they will ever get there, but at least there is some progress. Bitcoin though is failed experiment. It had it's run, and it is time to put it down.

To add to this, I want to point out that having excess capacity is the norm with fossil fuels as well. With fossil fuels, we typically average 50% capacity factor where we are only producing half as much power as we could be, and the rest of the production capacity is sitting idle. This is essential to be able to deal with variable demand and emergencies.

The excess energy these solar panels are producing isn't "going to waste" any more than those idle peaker plants are going to waste, or all the sunlight that isn't hitting a solar panel is going to waste. You pay to build the capacity, and then production is essentially free.

Not only is overproduction not a problem, we want more of it, to accommodate for seasonally variable production. Batteries are great for storing energy at noon to use at night, but it will likely never be financially feasible to store energy in the summer to use in the winter. In the long run, we should be sizing our renewable capacity to provide enough power at the time of the year when they are producing the least, and then just disconnect some of them when we don't need the excess power.

The only potential problem I see here is that they way they are managing their grid, they are paying states to take extra power to keep their grid stable. This should be fixed, first by building a reasonable amount of battery storage, and then curtailing the excess more promptly rather than let the energy markets go negative. But it is a temporary problem.

In summary I 100% agree. This is good, this is expected, we need more of it.

The purpose of needrestart is to check if any running software is using packages that have since had new versions installed, so you can restart just the software that needs to be restarted rather than rebooting the whole machine. So of course it uses python to check python software, and perl to check perl software, etc. Nothing wrong with that. Using OS package manager dependencies would result in tons of false positives, and doing everything in a single language would result in a ton of reinventing the wheel and thus likely introduce more security bugs rather than use the functionality that the various language ecosystems already provide.

No they couldn't. For decades after Tetris was released people thought playing past level 29 was impossible because you simply couldn't press buttons fast enough. It wasn't until around 2010 before someone developed a new hypertapping technique that made it kind of sort of possible, and then it wasn't until 2021 that the rolling technique was developed that finally allowed for real play at the higher levels. It was only after those techniques were developed and people spent years practicing them that anyone was able to play long enough to even get to that crash, which first happened a few months ago. Until then there was no point in having a modified version, because there wasn't anyone on the planet good enough at Tetris to make use of it.

So sorry to break it to you, but today's teenagers are playing at such a higher level than we did in the past, it's not even funny.

It has nothing to do with a what reasonable person would expect or want or think of Google in general. It is about how a reasonable person would interpret the contract (terms of service and privacy policy) that Google made people agree to when they installed Chrome.

Sending up new suits on the next Dragon is the plan (if they don't fly down on Starliner). The issue is that ISS only has two IDA docking ports, and both are taken. So Starliner will have to leave before the next Dragon carrying the new suits arrives. If there is an emergency evacuation in the few days or weeks between that, then they will have to evacuate in the existing Dragon without suits. In other words, this story is completely overblown and about the least interesting thing to talk about regarding the Starliner debacle, so of course it has been spreading around like wildfire.

Falcon 9 has had 3 failures in 354 missions, or if you exclude the earlier versions of the rockets, 1 failure in 298 Falcon 9 Block 5 missions.