I know it isn't popular here to RTFA, but "If you look at the timestamps on the articles, you can see that the problem was fixed in November 2009, just a few months after Windows 7 was released in July 2009."

So this was a problem for a couple of months 16 years ago. The summary really buried the lede here.

So the evil owners (TM) shouldn't be trusted to not monitor a terminal they provide, but you think they would not monitor their network? What benevolent corporate overlords are you you working for that provide unfiltered, unmonitored guest internet access?

First, most of these problems are about general remote communication problems, but the article is jumping to the conclusion that a wireless LAN is the only possible fix. Almost all the problems addressed in the article could be addressed with an email terminal.

Second, the article both says that there is WLAN on these ships, but the staff is "not allowed to use" it - while also claiming that the owners "donâ(TM)t want to put Wi-Fi on their ships". So which is it?

Saying it doesn't apply to client-side installs makes no sense, that is exactly where the ring-0 concern is, on the client machine. Sustomers surely don't care if the devs want to install things "server side" in their own ring-0.

Just when we though we were down to the final season of Snowpiercer, looks like we will get to watch the prequel live!

This is certainly not about "digital" it is about optical media, and the challenges related to optical drives. In future consoles offline distribution could easily be transitioned to other media, such as cards. Yes, they cost slightly more - but that won't be MS's problem.

Perhaps if the light could be contained in a series of transparent tubes, glass perhaps, it could get past the problem identified?

Assuming the big rate change here is that these staffers are being changed from contractors or tipped-workers, to standard workers. Assuming we should expect 'delivery fees' to significantly increase, and offset that by ditching tips?

Pretty sure you meant 802.1x (PNAC) not 802.11x (generic term for quite of WLAN protocols)

I read this title 3 times as "84 Amazon Delivery Drones...." as was looking forward to an exciting tweak in labor laws about AI's. I suppose this story is still about drones though....

The "Russian Wikipedia" is just an edition of Wikipedia written in Russian, it is not the Wikipedia "of Russia" any more than the English Wikipedia is the Wikipedia "of England".

I'm pretty sure we've already seen a documentary on what happens when you try to change to atmosphere to block out heat.

Want to show this is safe and effective? Start the test with all government owned vehicles, including all law enforcement vehicles. I'll give the military vehicles a pass until beta test.

Sure, you can sue anyone. But, they likely agreed to all the Google Terms of Service. Let's say best case scenario: they can get a FULL REFUND of everything they paid to Google. Oh wait, this is an ad-supported "free" product, and they aren't really a "customer", and have no contract? Welp, good luck with that.

If you attorney is relying on ad-supported services as part of their core business IT infrastructure, you should find a new attorney.