Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Is Apple itself guilty of child porn possession (Score 1) 63

Apple must have trained their models on a database of child porn, and their developers must have used child porn when constructing those models (I can't imagine a more repulsive job unless it's working on snuff videos), so is Apple in illegal possession of child porn?

Apple didn't create the database of hashes of child sex abuse images. The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children did. Apple just compares hashes of images uploaded to their servers to hashes from known images of child sex abuse. So no - Apple is not and was never in illegal possession of illegal images, at least not for the purposes of creating this database.

Comment Re: Soon, on the news ... (Score 1) 63

That's not how the software works. It doesn't identify genitals that appear to be those of underage kids. The software uses indexing (or "fingerprinting") technology that identifies known images of child sexual abuse. If you're going to throw out hypotheticals, it's probably a good idea to read up on what it is that you're talking about and how it works.

Comment Re:really (Score 2) 61

really? they plan on making more than $12 billion "eventually"? after "going public"? a company that basically just "sells" a "free service"? do they expect millions of people to pay $100 a year to have prettier emojis?

I honestly don't understand this.

Remember when Microsoft bid $44 billion to buy Yahoo in 2008? Yahoo absolutely should have taken that deal. I suspect that this isn't much different. I'm not an industry expert, but I have serious doubts about whether Discord will ever be worth that much. After all, the service that they provide has been pretty well commoditized - is there really anything special about it other than their user base? It seems like Discord is easily replaceable as a service, and it likely will.

Comment Web Pages Use Same Imaging Model (Score 1) 227

Web pages use SVG to render vector graphics. It uses the exact same imaging model as PDF and is implemented in all modern browsers. The web in general has taken a lot of lessons from Adobe because Warnock and Geshke, in the PostScript Red Book, got so much right about how to build an image model that many GUI developers are still learning today. If you start with a PDF, it should be possible to machine-translate it to SVG and present it as a web page.

PDF exists because it is trivial to generate it from the document renderer meant for printing. Although I have once in a while run into an improperly scaled PDF meant to be printed 8-up, I'm just not

Slashdot Top Deals

Swap read error. You lose your mind.

Working...