Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Wouldn't matter today (Score 2) 57

I have completely the opposite experience. I've actually noticed that Win11 seems to carefully manage system load during and after logon to keep the desktop mostly responsive, and it seems to actually delay or carefully sequence the loading of "background" tasks.

I can literally log in, fire up a demanding game and Windows will happily continue "lazy loading" stuff in the background. It might take a minute or two for things like Dropbox or OneDrive or whatever to actually appear, but the tradeoff is you can actually do what you want to do immediately. Windows 10 was similar but it feels like post-logon interactive desktop performance is even more carefully tuned in 11, and it's one of the (few) things that actually feels like a usability improvement.

Comment Re:Booze are boring (Score 1) 181

You're just ingesting a mind-altering substance that tricks you into believing you're having fun.

Pleasure itself is a result of biochemistry. Endorphins = endorphins; the source makes no difference. In favour of sobriety you could argue the health benefits, the money saved, the drunken mistakes avoided, etc. but proposing that the pleasure from alcohol is a "trick" is an argument that can be dismissed immediately. All of your experiences are chemical.

Comment Re:And there it is (Score 1) 361

It's not just that. Bi-partisanship has been eroding over the past 15-20 years to the point where the parties can't even get together on things they agree on. The non-stop mudslinging on social media has turned US politics into a circus and the people who actually want to get things done are too busy staying out of the firing line. Trump's decision to dig in and fill every post with loyalists has only exacerbated the issue.

The solution is not one-party dictatorship. The solution is all levels of government acting in good faith, with civility, and with the interests of the American people foremost in mind.

Comment Re:And as a reflex action... (Score 4, Insightful) 182

We have limbic systems and hormones and biological needs that all feed into our desires and our personalities and constitute who we are and how we behave in any given situation. Feeling - that is, both receiving and generating internal and external action-drivers - is, in my opinion, the root of consciousness. At least, of a type we can recognise.

By contrast, ChatGPT and all conversational AI are disembodied word-associating machines. They have no desires, emotions or even innate behaviours. They simply write like us because they've been trained on our writing - nothing more.

Bascially, it's impossible to have "will" if you don't feel anything - there's nothing to provide that impetus. And yeah, if we could computationally emulate the entire human body and all its inner workings down to the individual atoms you could probably say there's no functional difference between the consciousness in the emulation and an actual physical human... but we can't, and nothing we have built so far comes anywhere close.

The AI we have now can be useful, it can be impressive, it can appear insightful. It's not conscious and it cannot be. That is - I'm guessing here - centuries away. We can certainly build better chatbots though and gullibles can continue to be astounded by them, and companies can continue making stupid marketing claims about consciousness in AI to milk more investor money.

Comment Nah (Score 3, Insightful) 86

Pretty sure Google was just listening to his conversations on his Android device and the information "accidentally" bled over to its co-scientist AI. It's like when you casually mention coffee machines or something with your phone nearby and suddenly every advert you see on every webpage is for coffee machines.

Slashdot Top Deals

Ernest asks Frank how long he has been working for the company. "Ever since they threatened to fire me."

Working...