Err, I don't like SP2 because I've personally witnessed it fuck up 2 PCs to the extent that they wouldn't even boot.
We had to use System Restore to go back. I don't have the time to find out what it is about the computers SP2 doesn't like. The service pack should just work. If there's something it doesnt like then we should have had a warning saying "Cannot install SP2 until you remove foo/bar"
Secondly, on the many machines I admin which do run SP2 okay, performance is definitely slower with SP2 installed.
As for your other moronic comments:
OSX is a far better OS than Windows (stability, security, ease of use, performance and general overall cleverness). And I don't own, nor have I ever owned, an Apple computer.
Windows 98 is faster and more secure than Windows XP. It's also has fewer features and is more unstable. Oh, and it doesn't look as pretty, if that's your bag. Maybe people are still running 98 because their computers are not fast enough to run XP? Or maybe they just use it because they have it, it works, and they can't afford £250 to buy Windows XP Professional for no good reason.
According to PC World Business here in the UK, a copy of XP Pro will set you back £210+VAT, whereas you can buy a brand new NEC PC, 256mb RAM, 40gig h/d, LAN, keyboard but no monitor WITH a copy of XP Home for £199+VAT.
Does that make any sense to you?
While I'm at it, go and look how much a full retail copy of MS Office costs these days. How does £350 sound?
The latest version of Knoppix runs from CD, and if you burn it to a CDRW you can even save your settings onto CD as you use it. It includes an OS, Open Office 2 Beta (excellent IMO), not to mention shitloads of free apps.
I like Windows and I tolerate MS Office but I do not think they justify the insanely high prices MS charges for them.