Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:"Please wear masks inside" (Score 1) 600

So what you meant to say was "no one to my knowledge has got ill from a vaccine years after the vaccine, in a way that some people didn't also get ill shortly after the vaccine". Which is hardly reassuring. And is also false.

There are plenty of adverse side-effects from the covid-vaccine - the question is when the peak spike for these will occur.

To address some other errors of yours:

The surge in cases of narcolepsy was well above any other cause. Particularly in children where occurrence is normally so rare that the expected occurrence in population is zero. From flu or any other cause.

This is all in the reports made on the cases. Just spouting post hoc ergo propert hoc without looking at the evidence just indicates you don't want to admit you are blatantly wrong.

And yes, again if you read the reports the time between onset of symptoms and reporting to a medical professional was indeed separated out.

In short, people way smarter than you studied this, reported on it, addressed everything you could make up, and still find it was a disastrous problem with long-term effects, on going, caused by a vaccine.

So now you know.

Comment Re:"Please wear masks inside" (Score 1) 600

Ok, some more learnings for you then.

from TECHNICAL REPORT: Narcolepsy in association with pandemic influenza vaccination: the multi-country European epidemiological investigation dated 2012:

"New cases are still being reported to the EudraVigilance system in 2012"

Or were you just being deceitful when you said the *spike* occurred during the same flu season. Your claim was to your knowledge: "no vaccine has ever caused harm that showed up years or decades later." Are you shifting the goal posts to now want the *spike* to occur within the same year - new cases were reported three years later. But that's only because the report was issued three years later!

Comment I'm not happy with their censorship (Score 4, Interesting) 90

A friend of mine tweeted that he had finally created a non-trivial regex without having to look up the manual.

I tweeted back: "Congratulations. Now you can die happy."

My account was blocked for threatening behaviour. No one complained. Due to time zone differences, I don't think even my friends saw my response.

OK, so it's a bot. It doesn't want me to wish death on someone, even a happy one. I had the option to delete my tweet or appeal to a human for review. Being stubborn, I decided to appeal, even though my account was still blocked. Nothing of value lost, right?

I explained the humour, the idiom, that this was my way of congratulating my friend, linked to examples of such usage, in my appeal to the human reviewer.

The appeal was quick. Within the 72 hours. Denied. I either deleted my tweet or my account would be permanently deleted. And because of my failed appeal, any subsequent offence would result in my account being deleted. Without recourse.

So my account could go at any time. Who knows what idiom will trigger a bot. So my use of twitter is curtailed. I can't express myself. If I have to watch every word, why bother?

I think they are shooting themselves in the foot. Which I probably can't tweet any more.

Comment Re:They found another? (Score 0) 49

I'm confident that your waving away 10 solar masses due to gravitational waves is incorrect. The universe hasn't been in existence long enough for even a tiny fraction of that mass loss to occur.

Hawking radiation is the typical way we describe black holes as 'evaporating' though loss of energy, and even though that effect massively dominates gravitational waves, we're still talking trillions of years to lose 1 solar mass. Again, longer than the universe's age.

Slashdot Top Deals

It has just been discovered that research causes cancer in rats.

Working...