Comment Re:Okay, this is certainly said (Score 5, Funny) 43
You mean like in this crew photo?
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FMikeElgan%2F...
You mean like in this crew photo?
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FMikeElgan%2F...
So what you meant to say was "no one to my knowledge has got ill from a vaccine years after the vaccine, in a way that some people didn't also get ill shortly after the vaccine". Which is hardly reassuring. And is also false.
There are plenty of adverse side-effects from the covid-vaccine - the question is when the peak spike for these will occur.
To address some other errors of yours:
The surge in cases of narcolepsy was well above any other cause. Particularly in children where occurrence is normally so rare that the expected occurrence in population is zero. From flu or any other cause.
This is all in the reports made on the cases. Just spouting post hoc ergo propert hoc without looking at the evidence just indicates you don't want to admit you are blatantly wrong.
And yes, again if you read the reports the time between onset of symptoms and reporting to a medical professional was indeed separated out.
In short, people way smarter than you studied this, reported on it, addressed everything you could make up, and still find it was a disastrous problem with long-term effects, on going, caused by a vaccine.
So now you know.
Ok, some more learnings for you then.
from TECHNICAL REPORT: Narcolepsy in association with pandemic influenza vaccination: the multi-country European epidemiological investigation dated 2012:
"New cases are still being reported to the EudraVigilance system in 2012"
Or were you just being deceitful when you said the *spike* occurred during the same flu season. Your claim was to your knowledge: "no vaccine has ever caused harm that showed up years or decades later." Are you shifting the goal posts to now want the *spike* to occur within the same year - new cases were reported three years later. But that's only because the report was issued three years later!
To the best of my knowledge, no vaccine has ever caused harm that showed up years or decades later. Single-digit weeks, yes. Months, no. Years, definitely no.
Happy to update your knowledge.
Pandemrix flu vaccine caused harm that showed up years later.
I can: The Pandemrix flu vaccine of 2009.
That harm sometimes does not manifest until years or even decades later [...]
Can you cite a case where this happened from a vaccine?
Hi, my name is Satoshi Nakamoto. I seem to have lost the key to my old, insecure wallet. Please assist me in transferring my Bitcoins to a new secure wallet.
They're scientists.
They're centimetering closer.
Even reading the headline would prevent this reading comprehension failure.
The news is not about crypto which as both you and the article say was widely known.
This news is about omnisec, a smaller competitor to crypto.
It doesn't matter. As long as the robots think keeping the power plant functional and the antenna correctly aligned is part of Holy Writ and God's Will, who cares what they believe?
Ha. Thus universe is a grade 7 science fair project by a being totally unlike us, who is trying to calculate the upper bound on lithium production in a simple class 3 universe.
We are just unnoticed byproducts of that.
They were engineered.
Meh. I don't know where NASA gets its data from, but even cruising at warp 5, Voyager would only take 5 days to reach Alpha Centauri from Earth.
A friend of mine tweeted that he had finally created a non-trivial regex without having to look up the manual.
I tweeted back: "Congratulations. Now you can die happy."
My account was blocked for threatening behaviour. No one complained. Due to time zone differences, I don't think even my friends saw my response.
OK, so it's a bot. It doesn't want me to wish death on someone, even a happy one. I had the option to delete my tweet or appeal to a human for review. Being stubborn, I decided to appeal, even though my account was still blocked. Nothing of value lost, right?
I explained the humour, the idiom, that this was my way of congratulating my friend, linked to examples of such usage, in my appeal to the human reviewer.
The appeal was quick. Within the 72 hours. Denied. I either deleted my tweet or my account would be permanently deleted. And because of my failed appeal, any subsequent offence would result in my account being deleted. Without recourse.
So my account could go at any time. Who knows what idiom will trigger a bot. So my use of twitter is curtailed. I can't express myself. If I have to watch every word, why bother?
I think they are shooting themselves in the foot. Which I probably can't tweet any more.
I suspect the phrase "local disaster" as an official declaration allows people to claim against travel insurance, and has various other financial implications and provides support for those who were planning to attend and those planning to host.
I'm confident that your waving away 10 solar masses due to gravitational waves is incorrect. The universe hasn't been in existence long enough for even a tiny fraction of that mass loss to occur.
Hawking radiation is the typical way we describe black holes as 'evaporating' though loss of energy, and even though that effect massively dominates gravitational waves, we're still talking trillions of years to lose 1 solar mass. Again, longer than the universe's age.
It has just been discovered that research causes cancer in rats.