Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:How does this work? (Score 1) 172

In space, you have nothing to use. Many of the quoted nuclear projects still require carrying an exhaustible, explosive, material (eg oxygen, water, hydrogen) when the real goal of a space craft is propulsion by the nuclear reaction itself, with no other materials.

Of course you need reaction mass, so unless your design is one where the reactor fuel itself is spat out the back (NSWR, fission fragment, ...), yeah, you need reaction mass. You're not talking about nonsense reactionless drives are you? This is the real world, where we need reactions.

We are not at a stage in spaceflight that allows us to rescue a space craft. The shuttles are out of commission.

Why is the Space Shuttle required to perform a rescue operation? Actually, why would you use the Space Shuttle to perform a rescue operation? That thing only had a few hundred m/s of maneuverability once it made orbit.

Comment Re:Space radiators (Score 1) 172

And NTR is more than double the efficiency of chemical, so quite a bit better.

Solid core NTR has roughly double the specific impulse of the best (practical) chemical rockets, but you lose it all in tankage for that liquid hydrogen. If you try to use something easier to store, it's going to be heavier, and your specific impulse suffers significantly.

In addition, Rei mentions the new idea of adding LOX initially to burn the super heated LH2 to provide a big kick. That actually makes sense.

I don't know if you could call that a new idea. It certainly seems a fairly obvious one, and it's one I've heard many times before. The "afterburner" running on "superheated" hydrogen really doesn't get you any more performance than a traditional hydrolox chemical rocket would. What it does get you is not having to build two separate engines to get a higher thrust engine. You can reuse all the existing turbomachinery to save weight. What it also gets you is an extra pump tied to your expander turbine, a whole bunch of plumbing, more tankage, and an overengineered thrust chamber and nozzle that now has to withstand combustion temperatures.

If you need the extra thrust for quick transit through radiation belts, you're better off either adding an expendable kick motor, or just staging your mission above the belts.

Comment Re:Musk "conceived in 2013?" (Score 1) 60

was a series of movable doors that opened and closed as the train moved through the tunnel

That would never fly in the real world. Now all that air you let in has to be pumped out down to the level of a hard vacuum.. What moronic design are you reading?

Maybe one of the original designs from the 1800s, operating on the same principles of pneumatic tubes? Just ignore those pumping losses...

Comment Re:It was a hard way to make a living as it was.. (Score 1) 193

I'm honestly surprised they don't dock themselves right now, at least in a secured yard at a large facility. Counter to the above example, there is no unpredictable traffic, and there's plenty of room. The math to calculate a docking maneuver isn't tough, especially at a known, mapped facility, where you can trench guide wire or broadcast local navigation.

Have the driver drop the trailer off at a gate, and a cabless electric tug picks it up and takes it to storage or a door. The biggest complication is coming up with some mechanism to manage the brake lines.

Comment Re:DTCP flag set on all channels (Score 1) 156

Depends on the carrier, and even from region to region. Some people would get everything but the premiums, some would get nothing. Even more annoying, broadcast TV had a copy protection flag in the spec, that was never implemented on broadcast receivers... except it shows up and is active on cablecard equipment, meaning you can be blocked from recording broadcast television.

I've not paid attention to this in several years, so it may be the whole industry has shifted to copy-once/never, which activates full DRM.

Comment Re:Make DRM work with my CableCard.... (Score 1) 156

Transmitting everything ClearQAM is stupid. They would have to structure their system so that no two packages used the same channel, and then install hardware filters for each subscriber at the pole. It would take weeks to get a tech out to change your subscription, and it would be a massive, pointless hardware overhead.

There's no problem with conditional access systems, and there's no problem with CableCard when it is used as a simple conditional access system. The tuner feeds encrypted data into the card, and the card feeds unencrypted data back to the system. No expensive hardware filters, easy management of subscriptions, free and clear access to everything you're paying for. Everyone is happy, except for the pirates wanting to steal cable, and the content providers who don't want subscribers to have free and clear access to their rightfully purchased content.

CableCard is only a problem when it actually invokes its DRM capabilities, and because of the expensive certification process it requires of authorized hardware to uphold its DRM capabilities.

Comment Re:Does it account for greedy homeowners? (Score 1) 130

publicly funded streets

Funded and built for a certain capacity and maintenance schedule. Side streets are not built for heavy traffic flow and they require more frequent maintenance if they are used that way. It's not just a homeowner issue - it's a city planning and infrastructure issue.

That's bullshit. Weather and heavy vehicle traffic are what cause roadway deterioration. A whole year's worth of car traffic on a residential street doesn't equal the damage done by a few passes of a plow truck, heavily loaded with brine that it's spewing onto the surface.

Slashdot Top Deals

Would you people stop playing these stupid games?!?!?!!!!

Working...