If you had any idea what you were talking about, you'd know that was a meaningless question.

Still talking out of your ass.

Could have saved yourself a lot of words and just said, "You're right- I should shut up about things I know nothing about."

Sure, but even you admit we're simply drawing an arbitrary line at frequency.

Does the copyright consideration for a human change if they're blackout drunk?

Image models aren't really fixed for those with the resources to constantly tune them.

Pre-training isn't the end of the story. The SOTA models are constantly being fine-tuned, which is an update of their weights.

That isn't even surveillance. It's much worse.
It's a layer of middle-men misusing information to circumvent constitutional measures that are still very much intact.
This is still absolutely a problem- but it's a very different problem, and also a very solvable problem.

It is not analogous to a diktat from the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China.

You could have saved yourself a lot of words by merely typing: "I'm illiterate."

I followed the links in the link provided to find the technical details- you know, how wiki is supposed to be used. Class dismissed.

No, it's not happening here.

I'm as against this ICE horse-shit as the next guy, but the fact of the matter is, this has been an unenforced law for a long fucking time. It should have been removed. There was always the risk that someone would enforce it. Now you're shocked that someone is, and pretending like they're afoul of the law, rather than the preceding Presidents that chose not to enforce.

Further, these fuckers aren't disappearing.
If they were, they wouldn't be all over the fucking news. Habeas Corpus has not been suspended for them. I do, however, consider that a red line that I wouldn't be surprised if Trump crossed.

No. There is absolutely distinction there, and trying to pretend that there isn't is just a shithead tactic to merge different problems into one for the sake of ease of argument.

The Federal Government has no such control. Corporations are incorporated by the state they "reside" in.
Sure, the IRS acting afoul of the law can make life difficult tax wise, but that's it.

Pure fucking poppycock.
When a bill of attainder is passed taxing Microsoft into oblivion, then we can talk.

There's no willful ignorance involved, rather informed opinion- something you don't have here.

I work in the industry. They didn't tap my lines.
Sure, they got a bunch of shithead corporations to give them shit-tons of data, something that now that it has seen the light of day, doesn't happen anymore- but it was never some kind of universal tap. They don't have the resources, or the authority for it. What they had were bootlickers who went along with it.

I don't know that rich people with coke don't ruin their lives.
In fact, I suspect there's quite a bit of evidence to the contrary.

Either way, the effect of the law is a racial bias in enforcement.

No, but I'm completely certain that a competent administrator of your home router would have ;)

None of those things are in question.
You are not that "expert" though.
It's a rubber stamp by Amazon and Flock.
You're also pretending like evidence only includes depiction of a crime.

Why would I address your claim?
I can't remember the last time I was very stimulated at all by porn, so I sincerely doubt it's true; however even if it were, it's frankly none of your fucking business.
Lots of things are a "hyperstimulus".
You seem to think it's ok to legislate which are ok, and which are not. Legislating your morality is some christofascist bullshit, christofascist.

Also, why in the fuck am I unable to type "provide" without adding an "r"?.

Bingo. This isn't even really about age verification.
It's about banning porn- a fight they lost long ago.

The error is always assuming good faith. They have none.

lol.

Fucking Christofascists.