Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Not about News Sites - It's about the Open Web (Score 1) 134

"Apps" is the keyword here. Appy apps, which are infinitely appier than LUDDITE Web walled gardens. Apps!

Sorry for my momentary insanity. But this is the future. Want to read NYT? Get NYT's appy app. Want to watch p0rn? Get p0rn appy app. LUDDITE Google AI and LUDDITE web browser users can go pound sand. Apps! Oops, my mind got clouded again. But nvm.

Comment Re:Not about News Sites - It's about the Open Web (Score 1) 134

No, it's not likely for Web links to disappear, INHO. Their use case may diminish, but won't die. What will happen, IMHO, is a radical compartmentalization of the Web. And this will indeed be the end of the Open Internet as we know it.

Most of our internet activity will happen in walled garden apps. The WWW will still exist, but it will be smaller and much less people, mostly older geeks, will use it. Your kids and grandkids will probably never use it or even be aware of its existence.

Such is the fate of all open things that commercialize.

Comment Re:Neither are we (Score 1) 206

We are, each of us, about 3 lbs of low frequency nerve cells burning approximately 20 watts. Evolution used this bundle of nerves to create a staggeringly complex search engine, combining an inherited model with a limited learning mechanism and goal seeking.

Now, our huge, high frequency, inefficient, machine search engines are replicating our capabilities. Many (most?) have labored under the hubris that there is something mysterious and unattainable about the human mind: it's somehow beyond any conceivable algorithm or scale we can possibly fathom.

It's not. It never has been.

You're right noticing that the hardware of the human brain is hopelessly weak and outmatched. But perhaps paradoxically, this doesn't speak well of he current "AI"s. These models run on machines billions of times faster than our neurons, have access to gargantuan amounts of memory, and have been trained on almost everything humanity knows so far. And what's the result? Honestly, beyond pathetic. If the LLMs were indeed replicating our capabilities, then right now they would be super-minds dominating human brains as much as the light of the Sun dominates a small asteroid. But they aren't.

This means that LLMs work in quite a different way than a human brain. They're a dead end, with limited practical applicability. We need to stop the hype and invest our dollars in more AI research, which would lead to new technology, hopefully less wasteful and more useful.

AlphaEvolve is actively improving itself right now, both hardware and software

Computers are so fast that this evolution should be billions of times faster than biological evolution. Why hasn't this "AI" evolution yielded something worthy so far?

Slashdot Top Deals

<< WAIT >>

Working...