Microsoft does say when Windows 11 support ends. Under the same line you reference there are releases each of which has a defined support period of roughly 2 years. Should Windows 12 be announced, I'm sure the "In support" will itself get an end date which will be the same as the latest release as of that time.

While the poster blames Equifax they really should blame the IRS. CGP Grey explains this very well

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3F...

Oh, you sweet summer child. You think you turn it on twice a year.

The data transfer is background noise in the sea of other things our phones do, and passively looking for BLE devices in the background is something that is already being done.

*yawn*

A transaction tax would fix HFT in a New York microsecond.

And the BIN (bank numbers) of those virtual cards are trivially identifiable and able to be blocked.

Look, I get it: you want a world where fraudsters can operate with no regulation and rob with impunity and I don't. Let's agree to disagree.

They should not be allowed to run a platform and take "no responsibility" while raking a percentage off of fraud.

You seem to not mind that they enable fraud but even you admit they "sell" something. In a functioning regulatory environment, their business model will change or they will be shut down.

[citation needed] - the "Scamstarter" nickname didn't come about for nothing. It's not whether projects "succeed" or "fail" - it's that Scamstarter releases the money in its entirety without monitoring manufacturing or delivery. So scams proliferat and they allow "creators" to use trade dress of stores so despite the warnings, more than the "functionally illterate" believe they're funding manufacturing and reasonably believe a platform would exercise safeguards to ensure that at least the "creator" doesn't take the money and run, as has happened on numerous occasions with Scamstarter/Kickstarter giving zero fscks because they got paid.

You mean the donations not specifying employers? I'm not sure how that's proof of fraud but it does look suspicious.

That is a reasonable stance but Amazon is on the hook to make its customers whole when they're scammed by a platform merchant and so they don't profit from scams at customer expense like Kickstarter does.

Caveat emptor is not a good argument for allowing platforms that exercise no oversight and profit from scams to exist. I look forward to Biden's FTC clamping down.

If it were on a legitimate platform, I'd consider contributing now. But since it's on Scamstarter, I'll wait.

Damn it, you beat me to it.