Comment Re: Dear UK... (Score 1) 122
We disagree on what defines doing business in the UK. The justifications you provided can easily be rewritten from the other perspective:
They serve content and ads from the US. They make money from ads served from the US. The content served from the US serves their goal, whatever that goal is, financial or otherwise.
Internationally commerce, maybe, but they're not doing business within the UK. It's a lot closer to someone selling a doodad that gets sold overseas as well.
Why would it be their responsibility? Why isn't that, "then the UK can block them"?
... The difference is that the UK is a sovereign nation and gets to dictate what happens in UK territory.
Right, which is why it's on them to enforce it (IMO). They want to dictate this crazy shit, they can implement it. Why would the onus fall on the website?
I think the analogy is falling short. You are not a sovereign nation dictating laws
That's what makes it an analogy, and it's stretched on purpose. The question is still, once it reaches a point where you would agree it is overreaching, like in this stretched example, what does that change? It should be prevented from getting to that point - fix this before it's a step too far. As that famous poem goes, "First they came for..."