Comment Don't blame the pilot prematurely (Score 5, Insightful) 54
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3F...
When the investigative bodies break their own rules and behave suspiciously, it behooves us to understand that there can be many players with reasons to want to shift the blame to the pilots, which the investigators did by releasing incomplete fragments of the CVR, and not directly transcribed, not verbatim, but paraphrased, and none of the words attributed to a specific individual.
The uniqueness of good analytical journalism is that the value cannot be appreciated until the journalism is consumed -- in this case, listening to a few of the episodes. Many experts in relevant fields have contributed to their reporting.
The key alternative hypothesis, and one supported by maintenance records, aircraft documentation and air worthiness directives from Boeing is this: If the data stream to the FADEC that conveys the cockpit throttle control position data is interrupted, the control software is designed to shut down the engines. When the data stream resumes, the engines will automatically restart. If such an event happens during take off (which seems likely here, all evidence considered) the only action the pilots could take are the actions they did take on an uncommanded shutdown, the actions they are trained to take, and that is to toggle the fuel control switches.
In fact, the engines did restart, but because of the low altitude, there wasn't enough time to spin up to a sufficient speed to regain thrust. That the engines did restart and were not merely shut down and left off suggests the actions in the cockpit were intended to save the aircraft, not to crash it.
That's the TL;DR spoiler, but you owe it yourselves -- if you care about this story -- if you respect the families of the passengers and the flight crew who died -- to examine the events further, rather than flock like lemmings to draw conclusions based on a couple sound bites from parties potentially having an agenda to advance, which we have reason to believe is that of occluding their posteriors.