This is hilariously accurate, at least on 2-meter band.

I live in Colorado and own a Nissan LEAF with a modest 40 kWH battery. Cold weather is really not a problem.

Not if you live on the equator, you insensitive clod.

This was my thought as well. The whole situation seems very unjust. The safety driver was probably being paid minimum wage to take on enormous personal risk, both in terms of their own safety, and accepting full liability for any harm to anyone else caused by a system that clearly was not ready to be on public roads at night. The task of being a safety driver is impossible from the start. I doubt any human is able to pay full attention for a long period of time while not actively engaged and be ready to react within milliseconds. Uber knew that. Why else would they have a camera pointed at the safety driver unless the whole purpose was to pin any blame on them?

I don't know how widespread the practice is, but at my very large company streaming has been blocked temporarily to reduce bandwidth usage since so many people are working remotely over VPN.

Am I the only person who likes data caps? It's nice having 100 Mbps to download large files quickly, or even just webpages quickly, but like the overwhelming majority of people I have absolutely no need or desire to do that 24/7 and don't want to pay for the capability.

What about these ethics of firing the CEO because he was a Christian who believed what Christians have always believed about marriage?

That's not how manufacturing tolerances work. Tight tolerances don't mean pieces fit together tightly; it means the pieces are built precisely.

A much better idea would be a to have adults wear the sonar device to act as an inhibit for a wave based alarm sensor.

It works be trivially easy to program one to re-arm itself after detecting to activity for 5 min. Actually, a much better idea would be to have adults wear the sonar device to inhibit the alarm when they are present.

Autocorrect screwed up my comment, so you probably couldn't couldn't understand what I was saying. I do think transportation should be regulated. I was just saying that I am more in favor of self driving cars risking the lives of consenting passengers than I am of self driving cars risking the lives of pedestrians and other people on the road who don't get a choice in the matter.

If consenting passengers want to or put their lives in the handsof down technology why shouldn't they be allowed to? My concern is for everyone else out in the general population who has become test subjects without any say in the matter.

Even if the video wasn't darkened that doesn't change the fact that operating a self driving car with cameras that have such poor light sensitivity should be considered criminally negligent.

A quick look at a map confirmed my suspicion that the airport was just built on landfill. It looks like there is also a significant risk of liquefaction when the next earthquake strikes. https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpriceonomics.com%2Fwhat-...

To say that trucks are inexpensive compared to cars is just plain wrong.