Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: This is exceptionally unsurprising. (Score 3, Insightful) 20

In my area hospitals are a bit better staffed than that but the second part is dead-on. I've never seen any other industry where more ancient hardware and software is kept alive because of some obscure software or equipment that is absolutely unreplaceable and the vendor is either long gone or just doesn't care. Sure there are mitigating factors but a doctor or *shudder* board member might not see the utility of an air gap and only see that it's making people's jobs more difficult. Hopefully these very public and very expensive attacks will at least give IT staff something to point at while they're saying something is a bad idea.

Comment This takes a step towards a theory I had (Score 2) 141

I've long postulated that emoji will become an internationally recognized language in its own right, what Esperanto tried Emoji will succeed at. My prediction is some day you will walk through an airport or hotel and see instructions written in emoji. Seems silly to us but kids being born right now will probably have as much fluency in the subtle meanings of emoji as they do in any major spoken language.

Comment Is GPS even tactically relevant in this situation (Score 1) 148

"steering precision-guided munition" I'm no expert on GPS but I had always read that in a near-peer conflict GPS was assumed to be jammed to the point of being useless, and that for this reason almost all military equipment is built with reliable backups that will provide a similar if somewhat degraded capability. For this reason I always thought shooting down GPS satellites was unnecessary, especially in a very localized conflict it's pretty easy to just jam it. Obviously spy satellites are a lot harder to hide from, and they're also generally lower and therefore easier to shoot down, but again I understood we had alternatives like the X-37 that can maneuver and would ostensibly be harder to intercept. I'm happy to be corrected about any of this as I find it super interesting, but to me it seems this is a phony explanation intended to deflect attention away from their actual missions whichares probably a lot more closely guarded.

Submission + - US Seeks 70-Month Prison Sentence For YouTube Content ID Scammer (torrentfreak.com) 1

An anonymous reader writes: By pretending to be legitimate music rightsholders, two men managed to extract over $23 million in revenue from YouTube's content-ID system. Both were arrested, pleaded guilty, and now face multi-year prison terms. This week, the U.S. requested a 70-month sentence against the 'number two' of the operation, in part to deter future fraud. [...] Last year, one of the defendants confessed to his part in the copyright swindle by pleading guilty. Webster Batista admitted it was a simple scheme: find Latin American music that wasn’t yet monetized on YouTube and claim the content as their own. In February of this year, the second defendant pleaded guilty. Jose Teran signed a plea agreement admitting that he was part of the conspiracy, engaging in wire fraud and money laundering.

The Content ID scam was straightforward, Teran’s plea agreement revealed. The defendants simply identified unmonetized music and uploaded those songs to YouTube. [W]e discovered there were recorded songs of musicians and bands on the internet that were not being monetized. We began searching and downloading these songs. Once songs were downloaded, Batista would then upload them to Y.T. as mp3 files.” “We falsely claimed legal ownership over these songs to receive royalty payments,” Teran adds, noting that the scheme brought in millions. To collect these payments Batista launched the company MediaMuv, which became a trusted YouTube Content ID member through a third-party company referred to by the initials A.R. As the scheme grew, more employees were hired and tasked with finding more unmonetized tracks.

Despite pleading guilty, both defendants face a multi-year stint in prison. Teran will be the first to be sentenced and this week, the defendant and the prosecution announced their respective positions. According to the defense, Teran wasn’t the lead of the operation. As an aspiring musician he looked up to his co-defendant, who is portrayed as the brains behind the operation. [...] Teran and Batista at one point had between five and eight people working for them. These employees used special software to find unmonetized music which they would then add to their catalog, to exploit YouTube’s Content ID system. “Defendant, Jose Teran, engaged in a concerted effort—over nearly five years—to steal royalty proceeds from approximately 50,000 song titles, causing a loss of more than $23,000,000.00,” the prosecution writes. “A 70-month sentence is undoubtedly substantial but given Mr. Teran’s conduct and the need to deter future fraud, it is entirely warranted,” the Government’s sentencing memorandum concludes.

Submission + - Two Lawyers Fined For Submitting Fake Court Citations From ChatGPT (theguardian.com)

An anonymous reader writes: A US judge has fined two lawyers and a law firm $5,000 after fake citations generated by ChatGPT were submitted in a court filing. A district judge in Manhattan ordered Steven Schwartz, Peter LoDuca and their law firm Levidow, Levidow & Oberman to pay the fine after fictitious legal research was used in an aviation injury claim. Schwartz had admitted that ChatGPT, a chatbot that churns out plausible text responses to human prompts, invented six cases he referred to in a legal brief in a case against the Colombian airline Avianca.

The judge P Kevin Castel said in a written opinion there was nothing “inherently improper” about using artificial intelligence for assisting in legal work, but lawyers had to ensure their filings were accurate. “Technological advances are commonplace and there is nothing inherently improper about using a reliable artificial intelligence tool for assistance,” Castel wrote. “But existing rules impose a gatekeeping role on attorneys to ensure the accuracy of their filings.” The judge said the lawyers and their firm “abandoned their responsibilities when they submitted nonexistent judicial opinions with fake quotes and citations created by the artificial intelligence tool ChatGPT, then continued to stand by the fake opinions after judicial orders called their existence into question.”

Slashdot Top Deals

You can do more with a kind word and a gun than with just a kind word. - Al Capone

Working...