Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
The Almighty Buck

Journal tomhudson's Journal: More than 100 US banks expected to fail. FDIC getting ready. 12

The Wall Street Journal is pretty downbeat about it ...

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120398607404892133.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news

FDIC to Add Staff as
Bank Failures Loom

The FDIC is looking to bring back 25 retirees from its division of resolutions and receiverships. Many of these agency veterans likely worked for the FDIC during the late 1980s and early 1990s, when more than 1,000 financial institutions failed amid the savings-and-loan crisis.

FDIC spokesman Andrew Gray said the agency was looking to bulk up "for preparedness purposes." The division now has 223 employees, mostly based in Dallas.

The agency, which insures accounts at more than 8,000 financial institutions, is also seeking to hire an outside firm that would help manage mortgages and other assets at insolvent banks, according to a newspaper advertisement.

...

"Regulators are bracing for well over 100 bank failures in the next 12 to 24 months, with concentrations in Rust Belt states like Michigan and Ohio, and the states that are suffering severe housing-market problems like California, Florida, and Georgia," said Jaret Seiberg, Washington policy analyst for financial-services firm Stanford Group.

...

There have only been four bank failures in the past 12 months, a rate the FDIC has easily been able to handle.

Okay, what is the deal about this ... *only* 4 bank failures in 12 months, like that's something to be proud of??? Talk about low expectations.

Its obvious from the way that the banks got out of hand (and are now asking for a $760 BILLION bail-out) that US banks are not properly regulated. If the taxpayer is going to have to foot the bill in the end, the banks have no right to scream about government intervention into how they handle "their business".

So, which one will fail first - Citi or Bank of America?

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

More than 100 US banks expected to fail. FDIC getting ready.

Comments Filter:
  • by tqft ( 619476 )
    Citi has some serious worldwide exposure, bailing it out would be giving money to foreigners.

    A BoA bailout would help honest hardworking Americans. I vote BoA to go down and get bailed.
    • I heard somewhere that Dubai has bought some significant stock in BoA and it's their cash infusion which will be keeping it afloat.

      Dubai.
    • Here's the question - would a bail-out really help honest Americans, or put them on the hook for the acts of their dishonest neighbors?

      Why should speculators in one industry be bailed out and not others? Anyone with any brains knew Countrywide was heading for bankruptcy - that BoA paid $4 Billion to buy that mess (and let Mozilo take a $137 million bonus) shows that they are clueless. Any bail-out is throwing good money after bad, and you can be sure it will end up costing you - the taxpayer.

      • by nizo ( 81281 ) *
        Titanic crewmember: here, take this spoon and start bailing. I'm gonna go check on the lifeboats.
        • Titanic crewmember: here, take this spoon and start bailing. I'm gonna go check on the lifeboats.

          Passenger: Excuse me - calling this fork a spoon doesn't make it one ...

          • I'm amazed that you've not found a way to not pay taxes anymore. There's several legal ones, but I am not about to do anyone's homework. They cost me time, and thus value, to research and discover. Good luck fellas. It isn't impossible to be independent of the government, despite all the indoctrination that they "keep things together". Actually it is governing forces that make things fall apart.

            Show me the LAST time you can recall when a group of neighbors up and invaded some country, or burned a neigh
  • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Too big to fail (Score:3, Informative)

    by ces ( 119879 ) <christopher.ste[ ... m ['fan' in gap]> on Wednesday February 27, 2008 @02:56PM (#22576772) Homepage Journal
    Any of the big banks like BofA, JP Morgan, Citi, Wachovia, Wells Fargo, WaMu, etc. are going to be seen as "too big to fail". Which means that if they get into serious trouble they will be bailed out or forced to merge. And yes, just like the S&L bailout nearly 20 years ago the taxpayers will be the ones left holding the bag.

    I'd guess Citi is the most likely to run into problems simply because they seem to have been up to their eyeballs in every case of major financial fraud in the past 10 years or so (Asian financial crisis, Long Term Capital meltdown, Dot-com pump and dump, Enron, etc.).
  • I can dig it.

    The agency, which insures accounts at more than 8,000 financial institutions...At the end of 2007, it had $52.4 billion in its fund that backstops the nation's insured deposits.

    Not that I know anything about money I don't have, but the Brits throwing 107 bil at just one bank over the last five months looks just a bit more impressive.

    I think being merely broke puts me way ahead of the game.
    • I think being merely broke puts me way ahead of the game.

      Guess that makes me and my 3 figure savings account nouveau riche, huh?
      • HA! It can go up in a puff of smoke tomorrow. My peace of mind is priceless, though my stomach isn't exactly pleased. Gotta leave a little for the hamster to keep the generator running until sunrise.

"Just the facts, Ma'am" -- Joe Friday

Working...