Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment headline accuracy (Score 5, Insightful) 59

The governing body investigation did not find that he didn't cheat - it instead said they could not conclude that he did cheat. The distinction matters because the first statement implies a proof of innocence, which was not given, but instead the conclusion of a statistical analysis, by a single person, was that it could not be shown *from the data they looked at* that cheating did occur.

Lance Armstrong won seven medals before finally being caught.

Slashdot Top Deals

FORTUNE'S FUN FACTS TO KNOW AND TELL: A cucumber is not a vegetable but a fruit.

Working...