Comment Re: No datacenter (Score 1) 64
Spying is a primary use of AI and it makes spying on more people more feasible.
Spying is a primary use of AI and it makes spying on more people more feasible.
It's the rapeublicans who are raping children. Literally marrying children so they can rape them.
Did not read your defense of child rape
Hahahahhahahahhah
You claim scientists' predictions were wrong then cite as evidence things which were never mainstream views
You really are a coward
It's already the law at it's willful negligence, so the issue is enforcing existing law, not creating new.
But we won't do that either.
Surely some of these groups will be run by people stupid enough to help us do a fraud!
In this case the graphics capability shouldn't matter that much, as I have disabled animations on the Intel laptop because without that it was horrible. I haven't done any such thing on the AMD one, which also only has 2 GPU cores - it was in a $300 laptop. The Intel machine is a HP Elitebook... I remember when those were actually powerful, back in the Core and Core 2 days.
Doesn't Uncle Elon have like 15 children by 7 different women?
Yes, but he has to hire in the brain cells.
Correct, or the girls being coerced into marrying old Christian men in this country. Those Christians are the ones who lobby to keep it legal to marry and then fuck children in this country. But those are your special child rapists so you support those children being raped.
You mean what software told you, which is what you respect. That was my very point and you fell into it. Nice work.
You're using AI to try to "win" an argument on Slashdot because you were upset by someone recognizing your politics as idiotic nonsense.
Wait, now you're accusing me of generating my comments with AI? I thought you were kind of clever, but now I see you're only clever at trolling.
It's impossible to tell since the models don't reason. That's why they can say obviously incorrect things with confidence.
They have probabilities from it mixed in with everything else on their training data. They don't reflect the Internet so much as training data soup. But what's more important is that it's a semi-randomly generated chain of similarities. You can never ignore the randomness. That was added because it was found to make the output look more natural because otherwise it's too predictable, but it also is a reason why sometimes the output is inexplicable.
It's the randomness that I was bringing up primarily. You think you're getting data from the Web because it says so, but it's mixed with every other influence and it knows as much about that as it does about everything - nothing at all.
I like your AMD idea. They would have good vertical integration there, of the most important and expensive components. Plus it would be a way for them to finally get some competent programmers.
But in order to really make it work they would have to go back into the RAM biz...
x86? What year do you think it is?
If you think the system is working, ask someone who's waiting for a prompt.