It's quibbling, but "majority" is really shorthand for "majority of power". Other things being equal this will be the numerical majority, but in cases of countries that are part of a foreign Empire, the number of locals on the ground is irrelevant.

Well, please enlighten us, because as far as I know white supremacy is just a subset of racism.

Well, whatever, but all this argument shows is that (from an outsider's point of view) there is just 'pretty right wing' and 'extremely right wing' in US politics.

In the rest of the world, if you're racist you're not a "liberal" or "left wing", regardless of whether you think left wing is good or bad.

They know that ZOG is watching and waiting to take them off to political indoctrination camps if they dare to speak the truth in their own names.

Am I the only one who's finding it simultaneously deeply troubling and wildly amusing to see a right winger defend ISIS?

It's the usual right wing false equivalency bullshit.

"Yeah, I may have called for all people with brown skin to be dropped out of a plane into the ocean, but you once took the mickey out of Donald Trump's hair, so it's all just personal opinions."

The skull and crossbones/Jolly Roger flag was used by pirates in the 18th century, for instance.

No, but not every industry is good.

It takes a pretty fanatical devotion to capitalism to refuse to believe that some profit-making concerns may not be acting in the public interest.

Yeah, because what's going to happen is that climate change will be a precisely zero sum game, with any negatives exactly compensated by positives.

Makes you wonder what all the fuss is about.

Nuclear power does not make economic sense. You can only pretend it's profitable if you externalise the costs like insurance and waste disposal by getting a government to cover them.

Once they're built and generating electricity, no they probably don't have vastly different running costs than a coal or gas fired station.

But it's like saying your $1m Bugatti is not that much more expensive to run than a $10K Micra: even if they have the same fuel economy it's cheating just to look at MPG.

It's truly impressive how "the Anthropocentric Global Warming alarmists" manage to be simultaneously evil socialists determined to steal money off hard working capitalists, and plotters aiming for the greater concentration of wealth in an elite.

But isn't your average survivalist whackjob precisely the sort of person who thinks that 'global warming' is a hoax organised by ZOG?

Yes, it's called Fusion.

something something bananas more radioactive than H bombs something something waste disposal problem will probably be solved soon something something

Even given your amusingly generalised assumptions, this would only be relevant if intelligent people were somehow immune from greed and (metaphorical) shortsightedness.