Where did he present any actual evidence against Gonzales? He talks about the U.S. attorney firings, but mentions nothing illegal or unethical, citing instead the mind-numbingly inane buzzphrase "longstanding practice." Highlighting the inanity is the hypocrisy of bothering to cite "longstanding practice," and then immediately proceed to ignore the fact that it is "longstanding practice" to "shove aside" "exemplary prosecutors... to make room for rising [partisan] politicians being groomed for higher off
Karl's version of Parkinson's Law: Work expands to exceed the time alloted it.
I am missing something, I think (Score:2)