Comment Re:Can someone please translate this for me? (Score 1) 45
To be clear, the analogy between AI and corporations is not good. Think of narrow AI in agriculture. As a way to be more efficient and reduce the use of pesticides you might have a smart machine that recognizes invasive plants and destroys then with a laser. It can't do much else when not in a field with plants it recognizes. You might be able to teach that same smart machine to recognize people and shoot them with a gun, which is bad, but currently there is no way to extend this narrow AI into a malicious artificial general intelligence (AGI) that goes around killing people.
A corporation is similarly narrow when it grows and sells food. That kind of company doesn't have the infrastructure to make and sell washing machines, but they might start with repair of farm equipment, then assembly, and maybe they manufacture some custom parts, and when they get big enough they can acquire a factory to make farm equipment. And from there maybe they can get into the washing machine industry. The idea is that corporations have no limit to how big and powerful they can grow, that's why you see companies like Amazon that do online retail, grocery, IT infrastructure, and even real estate. This is an example of a runaway agent that is harmful to society.
It's harmful to society because we form governments and legal systems, and entrust them with power in order to keep peace and fairness. But runaway corporations can become powerful enough to destabilize that order. Honestly, this is kind of a bad point in the context the author describes, you don't need a runaway corporation (one that is wide in scope) to be harmful, any sufficiently large corporation can do it even if they are narrow in scope.