If a use ends up netting more than $1000 over what it would not using it, this is just a cost of doing business

You want to stop it? Jail time.

And because of that, not even their first R rated title. That's Down and Out in Beverly Hills.

How many of these sales were just to reviewers?

You do know the equivalent exists in Windows, right? There's zero need to use Edge to get Chrome

Too many chromium options to know which is a good one, but for Chrome, "winget install Google.Chrome"

"Free" displays that they end up charging you $1000 for if you don't follow the terms of service, which include leaving them on for a certain number of hours daily.

And that date interval is 521 days, so less than 1% of profit.

This isn't "massive" this is "cost of doing business"

The patch could just change it to a float.

They sent me replacement parts for my iMac G5 well over a decade ago, back when there was a power supply recall.

Yet they somehow managed to ship the wrong one, despite knowing exactly what model I had.

Considering how expensive something like this is, the workers aren't doing it without some serious management approval.

So many eminent scientists signed this, it's so hard to argue with them

Dr. Person Fakename
Dr Johnny Fartpants

And what is any scientific petition without Professor Notaf Uckingclue

Want to bet that doesn't even matter because they have mandatory binding arbitration so class action is moot and your suggested clause isn't even needed?

I have Pro. The setting exists for those suggestions, so I don't think the edition matters.

I'll be surprised if it's granted class action, chances are the EULA says arbitration, and that's binding (for now anyway).