Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment okay... yeah... and? (Score 1) 97

This seems somewhat "old news" certain applications still have fingerprints on packets that can be detected even if you can't read the data being exchanged.

Our Sophos XG firewall does this with many different torrent applications, and it ends up blocking non-VPNed, but still encrypted connections.

I'm a little sketchy about the "upload your traffic to us" part, but I guess that allows for more analysis across more hsots

SV

Comment I agree (Score 1) 442

There is nothing in his statement that is technically incorrect.
"The inability of law enforcement authorities to access data from electronic devices due to powerful encryption is an “urgent public safety issue,”" This is very much true. Metadata analysis can only take you so far.
"while saying that a solution is “not so clear cut.”" Hell yeah, there really is no solution

Some people use the [flawed] analogy of a safe. the FBI can either crack a safe, or burn through the door to get at the contents if you refuse to open it under judicial order. While this is still technically possible using strong encryption, the heat-death of the universe will probably come first, thus rendering it moot.

I'm going to simplify his statement: "The inability to access data due to powerful encryption is an urgent public safety issue" the "From electronic devices" muddies the water, and gets people all up-in-arms about "think of the children", or "OMG Terrorists"

Encryption is a wrapper around data. Much like an envelope, or a diplomatic bag (legally immune from search and seizure by international agreement) Can you imagine the uproar if the US suddenly announced that it reserved the right to open every diplomatic pouch sent to or from the US? or to listen in on every conversation between embassies?

I'm sure that the NSA, CIA, FBI, FSB, and every other national security agency world-wide is trying to break modern strong encryption. They'd be stupid not to! but what doesn't seem to be understood is that modern encryption is math. Math works for everybody the same way. If a hole is discovered in an encryption system, anybody that uses that system is then vulnerable to having their data read by a third part (authorized or unauthorized - from the legal, warrant has been issued state) This might be someone emailing pictures to their grandmother, it could be a terrorist cell communicating with a handler, or it could be instructions to one of our nuclear missile submarines. The Math doesn't care!

I'm sure that Mr. Wray would agree if I said that "the inability of the US government to access data from Russian sources due to powerful encryption is an urgent public safety and national security issue" I wonder how much he would agree if I said that "the inability of the Russian government to access data from US sources due to powerful encryption is and urgent safety and national security issue"?

Comment Re:Voter ID (Score 1) 391

I've moved since then, but I used to live in Northern Maine. for most of the month, the nearest DMV office was about 1.5 hours drive south, north or east (mind you, there's another 3 hours north of where I lived).

Yeah there was a mobile unit that visited for 5 hours a month in town... another 5 hours a month an hour drive away, or another 2 hours a month every other month an hour in the other direction.

and I had to prove that I was
a) A Maine Resident
b) a U.S. Citizen, or that I am in the country lawfully
and I would have to provide two forms of proof of identity, one of which must have my signature, and the other must indicate my date of birth

Comment Re:What exactly is ADD? (Score 1) 246

It sounds like your story is very similar to mine. I'm 31, and have just recently been put on Straterra (Atomoxetine) I also was diagnosed with dyslexia while growing up, but after looking at my records again, I have been told that it falls more under dysgraphia rather than dyslexia (writing rather than reading)

I was diagnosed as a... side-effect... of going through the diagnosis process with my son. As some posters have mentioned, it did start with a checklist (or actually a book of checklists, and Likert scale questions) and then a trip to the psychologist (during which time I was also being seen for depression) Part of the analysis for both myself and my son was reviewing academic records, and comments from teachers. (Parents, those report cards from 1st grade can make a difference as kids grow up) and then working on getting the right dose of the right meds. We resisted medications for quite a while, and are still working on getting it "right" to avoid turning our son into a zombie, but to get the benefits of the meds (for the record, we are keeping the doses as low as possible).

Are there side-effects, yes, are they worth the benefits, I believe, when used correctly, yes.

My coworkers can tell when I miss a dose of my meds. it makes it very difficult for them to follow my thought process. I have been lucky to find both a primary, and a secondary job that fit the way I function. I find I can go from hyper-focus to full-on attention-bounce. The meds have given me the ability to better control this, and have brought me to a much better place.

I failed out of my first university, and was only moderately successful in Grade School.

I don't know what discussions (if any) were had about me and my condition as a child, but I'm glad that we have been working on this for my son

Comment Re:Impound all servers... (Score 2) 375

H0 : There is no CP on the servers
HA: There is reasonable suspicion that there is CP on the servers

The burden of proof resides on the DoJ to "prove" that there is a reasonable suspicion that there does in fact exist CP on the servers, and that we must therefore reject the Null Hypothesis. until such time as the DoJ makes such a verifiable claim to this effect, we cannot reject the Null Hypothesis.

Short Version: "I Call"

Comment Re:When I was a kid we didn't have peanut allergie (Score 1) 327

One other thing to note about peanut allergies is that, from a diagnosis/prevention standpoint, they are all treated as "Severe"

My son has a contact allergy to peanuts that causes a rash. it is not an anaphylaxis reaction, so, very much non-life-threatening. This being said, the allergist, and his pediatrician still prescribed epi-pens, and had the school treat it, for the purposes of preventing contact, as if it were a life-threatening anaphylaxis reaction.
my understanding of the reasons for this is 2-fold:
1) Peanut allergies, as a whole, are more likely to be life-threatening than many other food allergies.
2) Peanut allergies tend to increase over time, thus increasing the likelihood that his reaction could evolve into an anaphylaxis reaction after further exposures.
Now, we told the school that his treatment plan is "Diphenhydramine HCL (AKA Benedryl) & Observe, contact us"
The schools tend to treat all peanut allergies as life-threatening so that they can have uniform rules while dealing with hundreds of "Little smiling faces" rather than having to know "Johnny gets X, Bobby gets Y, Jane get Z... ad. nausium.)

I have no sources for either of the above, but those are my understandings

Comment Re:Airspace FTW (Score 1) 312

Was talking with one of the LifeFlight of Maine EMTs the other day, with the IFR system that ME, MA and NH have in place, they have just gotten FAA approval for IFR highways.

Picture This, you're in Fort Kent, ME, and need to get to Mass. General *FAST*, they load you on the helicopter, the pilot lifts off, and takes his hands off the stick. Next thing (about 4 hours later) you are 50 feet above the helipad in Boston.

Supposedly this is a First In The Nation thing, but with the IFR post at all of the Maine hospitals, the LifeFlight helicopters can already do final approach to 50 feet above the pad unassisted.

I Trust robotic planes

Slashdot Top Deals

Serving coffee on aircraft causes turbulence.

Working...