Comment Re:Sorry, 1A comes into play here... (Score 1) 66
This is bullshit.
TikTok's US incorporation is a facade, a thin veneer, over an otherwise corrupt CCP. To the extent that TikTok, through its control of what users see, can influence elections, it is a political player, and should be subject to the Foreign Agents Registration Act. The only reason it isn't explicitly yet is because the full extent of its influence is not widely understood among the general public.
TikTok's danger has never been the more widely publicized privacy issues, but rather, the algorithm that is itself a censor of anything the CCP doesn't want a user to see. First Amendment arguments in the context of TikTok that ignore that TikTok itself censors its users are just mind boggling. One could argue that the government can't shut down the Wall Street Journal, but the WSJ is not a foreign actor. TikTok could continue to exist, with actual, unencumbered American ownership, but not as a CCP propaganda vehicle. The First Amendment does not guarantee that.