Comment Re:Not really good enough (Score 1) 76
Ask Jack Smith, but you should wait until the GOP in the senate is done embarrassing themselves trying to perjury trap him.
Ask Jack Smith, but you should wait until the GOP in the senate is done embarrassing themselves trying to perjury trap him.
This is more like worrying when someone successfully brute forces a 6 bit RSA key (which has been doable for a very long time. 6 bits isn't much space to do an exhaustive search in).
Stupid and malicious are different.
The offered narrative is "let us build the data center AI control grid now because it's only temporary until we can move it to space".
You and I both know that's not thermodynamically possible with known science.
So do the people saying it.
We have a real problem with Positive Projection where we are decent folks so we project that on people who are not. That is an error even though most people are decent folks. The parasites are not.
I only recent learned that Hanlon's Razor comes from a humor book about Murphy's Law from the early 80's. It's not some ancient axiom of wisdom - it is used by the Cluster B disordered to mask their nefarious deeds.
If you talk about this with most people these days you'll get the Positive Projection script executed like an autorun.
Everybody should turn off autorun whenever possible. Major risk.
> Gardasil
It's sold as an "HPV vaccine" but it only targets about 4% of HPV viruses, specifically the ones most likely to cause cervical cancer in women in their 40's. It's described in the Merck literature.
Not even the HPV most likely to cause throat cancer in men (usually acquired from lady parts).
If cancer treatment advances at the current rate (AI discovery docs estimate 9 years for the supermajority) it's possible that the Gardasil fatalities will have killed more teens than prevented deaths of women.
It's like a Drake Equation for cancer - the coefficients will determine the narrative either positive or negative. This is where free choice is ethically mandated.
Unfortunately there is considerable religious fervor about such things so very few people wants to scientifically discuss nuances.
Say more; be specific.
What is missing or broken?
You can't have everything... where would you put it? -- Steven Wright