> policies against "harmful content"

If you're watching your perfectly legal home video library you're not watching ads on YouTube.

This content is harmful to their profit motive.

> And anyone who disagrees has their comments disappeared

I mean, it's a literal conspiracy to ethnically cleanse an area of a population, and you're not allowed to talk about conspiracies.

But, yes, it's lessening up - I see in my recommended a Redacted news report with Senator Johnson talking about a new Congressional investigation into the 9/11 coverup, which we know is a real conspiracy.

The part about Saudi funding came out a few years ago but there's much more that's still "classified". Which is weird if it were what Bush & Cheney claimed it was.

Haven't listened to it yet, but the fact that it's in recommendations is a big change.

Now if you want to do videos about Hollywood people drinking the blood of trafficked children - well, that gets far more into speculative territory.

But even the Wuhan Lab coverup videos which were insta-banned just two years ago are freely allowed now. And there you see the death toll of suppressing "conspiracies" because the correct course of action cannot be determined if the truth is hidden.

If they act as a censor/publisher they're likely to lose their S. 230 protections which could potentially bankrupt them.

> while other people are allowed to use it

Depends what your social credit score is.

They won't tell you the number but they have one for you.

Truly they are completely out of ideas.

That's been stated for a decade but Apple copying the Windows Look&Feel is coming full circle with nothing left to defend.

Probably because Ctrl-Shift-V and Ctrl-V would be reversed in a sane GUI world.

Look up Richard Dodi and Paul Bennewitz if you want real evidence about how they will dispose of ordinary citizens for their military psyop campaigns.

It's a "UFO Story" but literally nobody investigating the phenomena believes that it was a real UFO story.

Still, a smart American entrepreneur died at the hands of military intelligence.

Dodi is now "on the UFO circuit" giving talks to chumps.

> the fact that killing off all mosquitos

Literally nobody is proposing this.

Yeah but Meta torrented the entirety of Z-Library, reportedly.

They won't even pay for one copy, even setting aside the issue of trained networks being a derivative work.

I so rarely need Calc in non-engineering programming but matrix algebra, yeah sometimes.

Yet there are libraries for the crunch so being familiar with the concepts and applications is more important than computation.

We should probably have CS-track math that focuses more on concepts and gets twice as much done than 1950's math classes.

Same, except for being 9 on a C=64 keyboard which was a bit non-standard.

I know some programmers who can do 120 wpm or more and that is impressive. I don't think you can get there without drilling and some people aren't built that way.

The speed helps when fleshing out a new class but that's about it. Prose, of course too.

Normally I can type faster than I can come up with good variable names or remember control flow syntax in whichever of a few dozen languages I have to use at any given hour.

This is supercool(ed) research but it still amazes me that bluesky startups like this can get funding.

Is DARPA backending it?

Or is the hope of a mega acquisition before market just that high?

Doing actual physics engineering mostly stopped after 1971 so the compass is pointing in the right direction, even if this one doesn't produce a usable product.

Radiance Corp too but they have an unspoken advantage.

They should have introduced the list with a colon, but legal writing is /intended/ to be hard to understand. It creates tons of downstream work for lawyers.

The "Plain English Movement" is an effort to stop doing the that. Here's a reasonable description:

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fir.lawnet.fordham.edu%2F...

Some people say their internal "Community Guidelines" prohibit promoting other platforms and this is selectively enforced.

Regardless of the veracity of those claims it could easily be added to their ToS for "safety".

>> I purposefully avoid demonstrating any of the tools (with a suffix that rhymes with "car")

Anybody know what he's referring to? I'm ignorant of that one.

Seriously - their best stuff is in NIC's, embedded (n100 etc), wifi, chipsets, etc.

Sounds like they're gonna 86 all that.

Meanwhile Chinese foundries will be delighted with RISC-V parts at 19% gross.

Somebody told me they hired an engineer to run the place - guess not.