Comment Re:Weather bands as well? (Score 1) 199
Hello,
Just an old habit from my BBS days, that's all.
Regards,
Aryeh Goretsky
Hello,
Just an old habit from my BBS days, that's all.
Regards,
Aryeh Goretsky
Hello,
What about adding the weather radio bands as well? While not everywhere has blizzards, floods and tornadoes, they are definitely useful for alerting the population to those types of emergencies in the places they do occur.
Regards,
Aryeh Goretsky
That would require him considering women as human beings rather than objects to fuck. He isn't capable of that.
Sometimes that choice is the right one. Not all parents are good parents. Some are downright toxic.
Adderal, duh.
(Well, in the quantities he *wants*, anyway.)
Training these models is incredibly expensive. In fact it's so expensive that there is no viable economic model to do so. As such, their options are either to drastically slow down the amount of new models trained or to go bankrupt. This is just a nice whitewashing of that. It remains to be seen if even using their models can be profitable, but we know that with the cost of training the next one they can't be.
This is the prevailing dogma, but has recently been challenged from more recent observations. (In defense of the dogma, we have very aggressively tested for preferred rotations with local experiments involving high energy particles. If there *is* a preferred rotation, its effect is vanishingly small, to the point of being functionally indestinguishable from flat spacetime at local scales, to an astonishing level of precision. This strongly suggests 'sampling error' for JWST data that follows)
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Facademic.oup.com%2Fmnras...
Recent large area surveys by JWST suggests that there is a preferred rotational direction and axis to disparate galaxies. Such a finding is inconsistent with the presumption of widescale anisotropy. (But again, that's a very bold statement)
It may yet be ruled out through further observations as a sampling error, but the statement that there are *no* indications isotropy is incorrect. The mere existence of this survey says otherwise.
If there really is a universal preferred rotation, then a 'fuzzy', 'proximal' position could be given as a baricenter. It wouldnt be definitive; too much can happen as random events to compute an exact baricenter, but a statistically probable, proximal area could be defined with some confidence threshold.
Again, *assuming* the JWST readings arent just a sampling error. Which it probably is.
Nope, not at all. The Chinese gov't has had to invest billions in BYD on numerous occasions to cover their operation costs.
Remind me again how many times the US govt has bailed out US automakers so they didn't go bankrupt?
Hello,
While it is a good start, it seems to be missing a few things that make a cyberdeck a cyberdeck.
This documentary contains a better list of required hardware, IMHO: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fyoutu.be%2FUzRjtvMQds4%3Ft...
Regards,
Aryeh Goretsky
None of that is true. Grow up and learn how to understand and rate journalism. Start with Appling the spj code of ethics to media.
" Anyone who defends that is off the deep end self-deluding and in full on denial of reality. "
So you post a factual incorrect statement then call anyone with facts delusional. JFC, take some actual media course. Like, in a class room.
He's incapably of learning. I don't thing he has learned anything since 1980.
OFFS lease stop lying. You wither didn't read it, or didn't understand it.
Some of us remember when he was alive, and read went o to study him.
If you actually know what you were talking about, you would understand the difference between Marxist communism and socialism.
Liars like you have become tiresome.
No, you did not. Yor just making things up becasue you are likely functionally illiterate, can'[t hold complex thought or idea, and have no clue how to admit you are wrong. I pity you, Because your are embarrassingly wrong.
A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming is not worth knowing.