Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
AMD

Journal sielwolf's Journal: Clayton just made The List 5

Once more, ESPN shows it's anti-Browns bias. The article is about the importance of scheduling in the NFL and how having a lot of sub .500 teams to play (and beating all or most of them) is key to winning the Super Bowl. So John Clayton goes into the teams with the best chances due to Strength of Schedule and points out the Rams and the Chiefs.

And in both cases he mentions the Browns as being easy pickings (as even though they went 9-7 last year, they lost all their LBs and will not hold up).

Excuse me? Fuck you, dickhead! I'm sorry but the Browns went blow for blow with the fucking Queefs last year and lost only on a damn helmet throw (you do remember this, don't you Clayton?).

Secondly, the Browns starting LBs had a grand total of one sack and one interception last year! And although Earl Holmes was a supposed run stopping machine, the Browns were 22nd in the league against the run! Fuck this. This month's SI says that both Holmes and CB Corey Fuller are completely overrated. Of course now both aren't with the fucking Browns so it's ok to point out that fact.

What about the damn Jets who lost four players to the 'Skins and Pennington for the year? And I'm not buying the Patriots since they too (as this article points out) benefited from a very easy schedule their Super Bowl year. But you don't hear shit about them in this article.

Nope. The Browns lose three underachieving players and ESPN has them already lined up for a 3-13 season. People talk about an East Coast Bias. I don't believe that. I believe in the Handjob Sports Media Bias: an infatuation with success and star-power and little ability for objectivity. They spent last year fauning over the Pats and Rams as they circled the toilet and ignored everyone else in the damn league. Why? Because they couldn't get the taste of Tom Brady's and Kurt Warner's cocks off of their minds. Chris Berman probably beats out Lil'Kim for having the illest deepthroat in New England.

Man... somedays I pray for Trey Wingo to go mad insane and just wipe out the whole lot of ESPN's anchors with bursts from an AK-47 (c'mon, you can see it in his eyes). Who here doesn't think Sunday Morning Countdown wouldn't benefit from the LACK of Berman?

Fuck it. Better to get no hype and run the advantage of the underdog. Let the Colts and the golden child Peyton Manning come into town thinking the Browns are an easy mark. I don't fear this guy. He's thrown up a fucking donut in three playoff tries. Time for the season and to hand out servings of Shitkickings with a seasoning of Foot in Ass.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Clayton just made The List

Comments Filter:
  • But you do realize, the Browns suck anyway right? :)

    S.V.
  • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Man, so I put points down on the Browns and they can only generate 6 points? Well, that's twice as much as Chicago, right? It was an interesting first week...which will be completed tonight. What a surprise to see Houston and Minnesota win. I know you love the Browns, but you can't blame the media to not care about them. They had a positive record? Big deal. Get them to at least a championship game in the playoffs and people will take them seriously. Do you think I am gloating over my Bronco win? S
    • I just wanted to see at least one positive thing said about the Browns by ESPN (instead of their implied message that they only got into the playoffs via luck). Strangely it came last week: Len Pasquirelli actually picked the Browns to win the AFCN. Wha?!? Even I'm not that crazy. I'm no straight up fanatic (I can see the Browns' faults). I just want some more objectivity from the media.

You know you've been spending too much time on the computer when your friend misdates a check, and you suggest adding a "++" to fix it.

Working...