That's the most helpful response I've had, thank you.

Unless you're talking about cron jobs, I don't think I've had cause to do that myself. I'm trying to remember if I've seen the no-wrapping issue you mentioned, but most of the terminal interfaces I use handle wrapping. Or I resize the window. Obviously. that would be a pain, but if I'm in a terminal I can't resize I probably have bigger things to worry about. Like a dying drive, or I'm in a frustrating-for-other-reasons HyperV remote desktop window.

Okay, but isn't that also fairly common?

And did the kernel change noted in there ever get made?

If it's bad, why do distros keep adopting it?

This is a sincere question. I don't understand the controversy.

Forgive me my colloquialism.
What's bad about it? What's good about it (there must be good, otherwise it wouldn't be so widely adopted)?
I don't have a dog in this fight (forgive me my idiom), and don't really know what the fight is about.

Why do some people hate on systemd?

There are new players entering the market, and new capacity is being built by the big 3. Who can't try and drive anyone out with a price cut until they've cleared the backorders and produce batches that aren't already sold.

There are a couple of hurdles I wasn't aware of. Like Japan restricting etching gas exports and EU environmental policy that's forcing fabs there to retool.

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmarkwideresearch.com%2Fnew-ram-market

If you're going to tell me what I think, at least be correct about it.

Isn't this all part of the Biden broadband plan, and the associated federal dollars? Sounds more like local governments looking at what the feds gave the ISPs and trying to get some of it.

Is that why their population is collapsing and they just banned economists from discussing the economy on TV without prior approval of what they will be saying?

We have over a century's worth of evidence that Socialism doesn't work. Across the 20th century, it only brought about mass slaughter and suffering.

Biden's broadband initiative is fascist?

Are local governments slow-walking Federally backed deployments and/or trying to squeeze some of that cash out of the ISPs? If they are, the feds may have explicit authority to step in.

And this is all Biden's broadband push, right?

Do you need to be a public utility to do those things?

Railroads and telecoms are the ones people forget about. Railroads captured the regulators back in the 19th century, and ATT got to write the rules for their industry in the early 20th. Big surprise, ATT quickly became a legal monopoly.

China wouldn't follow either. Almost all AI development is in the US or China, so it'd be the rest of the world trying to tell the two most powerful nations what to do. And they don't have to listen.

Last I heard, the AI companies were publicly calling for regulations but fighting them privately while also taking steps to ensure that if regulations do emerge, they'll be the ones writing them.

That sounds familiar...

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.academia.edu%2F56573...