Metro is problematic from the start. Microosoft's stated reason for Metro is that they believe that touch computing is the future and that enterprise will demand it. The other reason for Metro is that they want a consistent interface across all windows platforms. The problem is that there is not many touch laptops out there and they cost much more. The updating tiles make sense, but you cannot filter information that is being displayed. The big issue is no start menu. Sure you can type in the name of the app, but what if you cannot remember all the programs you have. You can install Smart Menu, but why should we have to ....? Why are the Metro apps all full screen only. Multitasking just became a big headache...! Business and especially mid to large business are going to be very reluctant to implement win8 and be forced to spend lots of money to retrain their users on a unintuitive GUI. Most businesses are sticking with Win7 or are probably using the Win7 downgrade for new machines. Does touch make sense, possibly. Perhaps some users will use the touch only sometimes. In the end I think we are going to see either a Win8 SP2 reloaded or they will rush out a version of Win9.