Why, are monks primarily into barebacking? It's not like religious figures who have promised not to have sex don't have sex.

"What makes the ISPs willing to "stomp" it is that by having information on what is talking to what, they are liable for participating in a crime, they are not the neutral carrier they should be."

Omfg no.

The USPS also has information on where packets are going, so do UPS and FedEx. Knowing the destination of some information is NOT what determines whether or not you are a common carrier.

Being against Nazis used to be an American value.

Now Nazis cry about the Nazis they voted for being treated like Nazis.

And then they claim that's causing the country to be divided.

Hey, stop acting like a fucking Nazi.

Stop allowing unregistered users to access even slightly [computationally] expensive content... Anything uncached, really.

Institute a delay and possibly an additional verification requirement before users can view the most expensive content.

Anything everyone can see should be aggressively cached.

You can't put "that aside" because Apple is prohibiting those companies' "crap" working with Apple products. Remember when Microsoft used a secret API for Office, and the public API functions were often literally nothing but the secret API functions plus a delay loop? You should feel about this the same way you felt about that, except moreso — because this is the same thing, only worse.

That's a bullshit comparison, as it is exactly the opposite of this situation. In your scenario, someone is forced to provide products and services. What's being demanded by the EU is alternatives to products and services provided by Apple.

If that's true, then Apple's platform is already insecure. Why? Because it's depending on security through obscurity. If you can only keep APIs secure by not allowing anyone to use them, then they are clearly insecure. And if your API's security depends on blocking third parties, then anyone who compromises one of your first party devices and has access to the API is going to have the opportunity to find its defects.

I don't know if that's true or not. It's at least equally likely that Apple's security is average, and they are only trying to protect revenues. That revenue protection is anticompetitive right on its face, and the only alternative is incompetence. And in fact, Apple is literally claiming incompetence here! They say they cannot maintain security while allowing others to access their APIs, well that only means that they cannot maintain security period. This is a glorious opportunity for Google to advertise Apple's statement of incompetence, and I certainly hope they press their advantage.

They are already making no promises about even their components. They exempt themselves from liability in the license, like everyone does.

That is literally the whole idea.

Pussy offers me something I want, while systemd takes away things I want, like early boot logging.

Not nearly as ridiculous as trying to troubleshoot a boot problem caused by systemd which occurs before its bullshit logging eventually begins, which has to be done with a debugger.

I thought the same thing, but then I thought about it some more. They could instead only have access to a container where a daemon which uses *pwent functions runs. It has its own namespaces.

*It doesn't affect Debian systems until you install systemd-coredump.

Per TFS, Debian issued an advisory.

There would be no need for them to do so if Debian systems were not affected.

QED, TL;DR: yes it does.

If there were actually anything communist about China, yes it would be.

People who are employed find it easier to find work. I think the theory is that employed people are necessarily employable. This is bullshit, as companies hire the wrong people all the time, but the idea is attractive to the intellectually lazy (like most executives, managers, and HR workers.)

"That is what they said about computers, that is what they said about printing press, that is what they said about factories and robots."

And they were right every time.

"It's a collection of utilities and most of them are broken out in most distributions"

You had me at broken