I would not call it a hybrid exactly. They created a for profit company (capped profit actually) that was majority owned and controlled by a non-profit company. This seems to me like an inherently unstable arrangement, since the incentives and motives of the non-profit board were not well aligned with the minority owners of the for profit company. When the value of the for profit company soared, the instability increased and the whole thing collapsed.
One trillion in debt is peanuts. The US debt is so large that the annual interest payments are one trillion. Now that is a serious amount of debt.
He clearly drank the water.
There have been a number of comments pointing out that Oracle distributes a clone of RHEL as an example of corporate freeloading and justification for Red Hat's actions. It is also worth pointing out that Oracle is a signficant contributor to the Linux kernel (https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Flwn.net%2FArticles%2F915435%2F) that Red Hat is distributing and charging their customer for. I believe that most Linux kernel development is now paid for by 5 large tech companies. Will those companies continue to support Linux if Red Hat is capturing most of the profits? No idea how this is going to play out, but it will be interesting to see if these businesses can come to some sort of accomodation under the terms of the GPL.
Yeah, I did not understand this quote at all. I had always understood the agrument to be that drug use in communities of color was comparable to drug use in white communities, but that enforcement was focused on communities of color so incarcertation rates for drug crimes was higher, and systemically racist. Assuming that Amazon's random drug testing was truely random, if drug testing disproportionately affects communities of color, then people in those communities must be using drugs at higher rates. That is not evidene of systemic racism, and indicates that argument of systemic racism in drug enfocement might be bogus also.
Well said. My only quible is with this sentence.
Python has much more to learn from Java, C, Kotlin, C#, Go, and other serious languages."
I don't think that Python has anything to learn because Phython is not trying to be Java, C, Kotlin, C# or Go. A programmer who uses Phython for a professional software project of any size or complexity has a lot to learn. Unfortunately, programmers tend to use the tools that they know, and lerning that Phython is not the right tool for some projects might take a while.
You just need to have adequate crypto mining capacity available to suck up any excess energy. See crypto currency is good for something after all.
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds. -- Albert Einstein