The article says: "Historically, new college graduates were more likely to have a job than the average worker.".

It's a broad brush statement with no geographical or industry scope, and I don't think it's universally true.

In many countries or professions, unemployment rates of recent graduates is way higher than that of experienced folks.

I'm for trend reading as much as the next person, but vague, "not even wrong" premises don't help their credibility.

... and what the heck it is about still remains a mystery.

Well, they did stop all the thieves there.

Owning or using Western cars discredits the Russian industry, therefore the Kremlin, so it should be illegal. They just need to hop into their Ladas even if the original ones were Italian Fiat models licensed to the USSR. It's a three-day special industrial operation.

How is it like compared to vanta black, which some arsehole patented?

Aluminum, back when it was a novelty, used to be pricier than gold, people bought it as a status symbol.

Here's the thing: if you reduce the price of something, and demand is elastic, sales volume increases.

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F...

If the unit cost of an imaging procedure drops, it shifts the optimal resource allocation in healthcare. It becomes more sensible and economical to order radiology than before. Even if volume doubles while AI reduces human involvement by 30%, that's still a net increase in demand for radiologists.
Consider also that more people likely work in today's energy sector—oil extraction, nuclear plant operations—than ever chopped wood for a living in the middle ages. Energy output is vastly higher, efficiency gains are even greater, and total employment is somewhat higher too.

So they replaced one russian spy with ... another?

That's not how autocorrect works, liar boy, but you do you.

WTH is "primative", do you mean, primitive?

Of course, Kicking Pat Gelsinger had nothing to do with either leaving Intel in a sorry state, or helping it recover, once he was back. And especially, he has nothing to do with the preparedness of the organization during the couple of years he was away, because the way top management works is that actions only ever have immediate impact, which of course no longer applied once he was back.

Sheesh.

That Ukraine (a non-NATO country) got attacked and the Baltic countries haven't, and that Sweden and Finland felt the need to join NATO, and that former Warsaw Pact and Eastern European countries correctly predicted that russia may well regress back into the imperialist power they had been for centuries, are not good enough proof for you that NATO is just as necessary today as until 1989?

> European have not evolved. Their geographic and political reality encourages wars among their own states.

The only ongoing war is an Asian country (Russia) invading a European country (Ukraine).

Lol. Such a terrific job. That alleged set of US money laundering operators is selling out Ukraine to putler as we speak.

I suppose it's tongue in cheek as it's russia that's been gaslighting its own population about nazis (of which russia has more of its own than any other country).
Still a controversial choice as it gives the excuse to russians and western tankies tol shake their head, pretend or for real.

Why not poof the location such that it gently turns back and hits the kremlin midget?