Can you remember when the laser was "a solution looking for a problem to solve"? (And actually AI is already addressing a wide number of consumer problems with highly varying successes. Sometimes it works quite well.)

Yeah, but the last time they were in real trouble they were only kept going by two things:
1) Microsoft wanted to avoid monopoly prosecution.
2) They finally brought Steve Jobs back.

Well, they aren't in that kind of trouble yet, but I don't think either of those two "saviors" are likely to help again.

Nailed it.

I'm going to chalk this up to miscommunication because MCP is not a discovery protocol, it's an client/server protocol which means it could be between your PC and something on the internet. How Microsoft will manage MCP connectivity has only been defined as "A proxy to mediate all MCP client-server interactions.". My point was that MCP clients would likely be interfacing with a server on the internet rather than an MCP server on one's LAN.

It depends on context. When someone speaks for a company, I it in the the context of the company speaking, not the individual speaking. By reducing the context to merely an individual then you provide a lot more room for them to deceive you in subtle ways.

I understand, that it's difficult to relate to my position and I wish I a greater level communion with humankind. It is my understanding that in publicly traded businesses (like Microsoft), high-ranking corporate individuals exploit how people perceive what they are told. I tend to view actions on a larger scale which is why I find destructive behavior like subtle deceit so infuriating as it's harmful to humanity.

Ultimately, I think deceit may be the most destructive human behavior because the most terrible actions are only possible by deceiving others beforehand.

I don't know what will eventually kill Apple, but I am confident it won't be "fell behind on AI." They can license that.

nailed it.

Yeah, just another example of Northern China stealing from the South.

Good luck, let me know how it goes.

With the attention mechanism, they're still using gradient descent, which is just a heuristic that trades off (quite a bit of) computing effort in exchange for some accuracy.

As to the answer to your specific question, I don't know the answer.

Duolingo helps you memorize words and keeps track of your progress.

Forget the spoiler games for the series and just play the real Duke Trebuchetem game, Duke Trebuchetem Forever! I've already preordered it and am cryogenically freezing myself so I can play it when it's released in 200 years.

Oh sweet summer child, that is clearly not what's happening.

Which means "top priority" is actually a lie since the bounds have a nigher priority.

I despise liars and if you lie for personal gain then you should not be allowed to be part of society.

This is a lie because the AI components being installed is completely unnecessary in the first place. Furthermore, if security was the top priority then it would be disable by default and limited to users who choose to install it. Since these are not how it's being deployed it's clear that David Weston is an untrustworthy piece of shit that will lie to you for personal gain.

Stories have power.

But then, so do Studio bottom lines. Great show. Happy for the three seasons.

Just a public service announcement. When people say RISC-V is open source, that does not mean RISC chips are themselves open source, like GPLv3 software would be, for example. All "open source" means in this case is that there's no license fee for the ISA, and the basic specification is freely available and redistribute-able. However all RISC-V chips available on the market today are 100% proprietary and closed source. You can't just download your favorite SBC's core and dump it in an FPGA for your own hacking and creating a derivative work. Obviously a company could do that, but I don't know of anyone who does, and RISC-V International does not require that.

If you were wanting to design and build RISC-V chips, you have two choices: design your own core from scatch, or pay to license an existing, proprietary core, along with other proprietary extensions.