Even if you can't train the model yourself, training data should be provided.If copyrighted material can't be shared, name of the content and proof of license should be included. Obviously it won't happen because it's all copyright infringement. Funny to see Sam Altman complaining about deepseek using openai to train their own models. Using a blog post to train their model is not copyright infringement but using their weights to train your model is copyright infringement.

It is the Turing test. LLM can pass most of it already. I don't think it is regarded as a proof of intelligence. To me there is zero chance to reach something similar to biological intelligence as long as AI can't experience real world and learn from it in real time. LLMs, which are our most advanced AI, are far from doing this. What can be achieved just by using natural langage is impressive but it clearly has limitations, even Cudennec believes LLM are a dead end. Interesting article: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmedium.com%2F%40pavelgordo...

This a race for the super AI bubble explosion. I bet the big promises made to VCs and states won't be honored by tech and it will end in a mega crash. AGI (whatever it means), let alone super agi, won't happen in our lifetime.

We should start by giving a proper definition of intelligence. I guess nobody can agree on one. Obviously LLM sellers have a very loose definition of intelligence so they can claim intelligence and use big words such as reflection and thoughts. Obviously, there is no proof you can't replicate what a brain does(you can't prove that something doesn't exist!) but more importantly LLM are absolutely not a proof you can.

Current LLM can't learn anything new outside of the slow training process, it's a big limitation to compete against biological being.

TF2 has been some kind of bot dystopia because Valve did nothing for years.

This. EA release AAA games every years, manage multiple studios. Valve manages an online shop and releases something every 10 years. It makes no sense to compare them. It almost not the same business, they don't have 13000 employees to manage origin.

Probably because you don't like playing video games. From indie to AAA there is a ton of good games, no way you played all of them.

But if some miners stop mining, the difficulty decreases which makes it profitable again. The game for miners is to be able to survive between prices drops.

AI is also supposed to do that. You will be useless to the Company.

People who enjoy reading LLM shit exist? Put "generated by AI" at the start of an article and I won't waste time reading it.

When they became journalist, they expected to see theirs writings in a journal not in a LLM those aim is to replace them. Not hard to understand.

More likely: destroy middle class, put most of us into slums and let the ultra rich enjoy life.

It is a threat because of all the scams, low quality content and hallucinations.

Being super intelligent, they can fight entropy if they carry enough energy in their spaceship, they can fix their spaceship and themself. Humans don't know how to fix themself and always die.