Comment TLDR (Score 3, Funny) 118
something about cats?
something about cats?
This is absurd that they just let it drive away without a citation. When they licensed this company to start putting auto drive cars on public roads, did nobody ever ask what would happen if one violated a traffic law? The company needs to be penalized. In fact I'm sure there *is* a mechanism to penalize the company, but the police officer was just ignorant.
Agreed. Dropping a ticket in the driver's seat is kinda ridiculous, but there certainly should be a mechanism for recording infractions and penalizing the company.
This makes no sense when you look at it. We are trading one foiegn power for another. Makes me wonder what the REAL reason for this change is.
To put a major social media company under the control of right wing political actors.
Zoox has always been a stupid fucking idea. They blew BILLIONS of investment before Amazon bailed their failing accomplished nothing asses out. They have virtually nothing to show for it.
They got more self-driving cabs than Tesla, and Tesla is getting hundreds of billions in valuation from their "Robotaxi".
In either case, if they can scale this there's loads of money waiting. I think they're currently Waymo's only real competitor.
He's not a singer either, per se...
You can't say he didn't boldly go.
Anthropic wouldn't have gotten into any trouble at all with this if they hadn't torrented a metric shit ton of books. If they had simply purchased a copy of each one second hand, they would have been clear training their models on those.
True, but it's a hell of a lot easier to upload a torrent of scanned books than purchased and scan them yourselves.
Plugging in your car while parked? Assuming there is an outlet near by, you have an extension cord, and your heater cable is in good shape?
I thought you didn't want any obstacles to using your vehicle.
When I buy a vehicle I don't want any obstacles to using it, even surmountable ones. That just means your 40k vehicle is a pain in your ass.
You know what else happens in -40C? Your oil turns to sludge and the weakened battery in your ICE vehicle is unable to get the engine running.
I'd rather an EV with reduced range than my ICE car not starting.
Why won’t Poilievre get his security clearance ?
I have to take him at his word that he does not believe a blanket and permanent muzzle serves the people well. I'm actually inclined to agree given secrecy under the guise of "national security" or "parliamentary privilege" seems to be a frequent cover for various malfeasance. You know what they say about sunlight being the best disinfectant. Good on him not joining the "not allowed to ever tell anyone anything" club, because it's permanent. They can revoke your clearance, but you are still bound by its terms forever.
Nah, that's BS. As far as I can tell PP refused the clearance so he would have an excuse to demand it be public (so he could see the report) at best, and at worst not seeing gave him more latitude to scaremonger.
The guy literally went into an election campaign willingly blindfolded about foreign attempts to infiltrate his party. That's damn close to disqualifying in my book.
EVs in Canada wouldn't seem to be a good fit given the winter temperatures of -40. Vancouver BC is warmer, but Edmonton certainly isn't.
I'm in the Edmonton area, -40 happens, but it's pretty rare (especially with global warming).
And cold does hurt the range, but it's not insurmountable.
If you go backpacking in the mountains it's not hard to get out of range of cell service, even if you're on fairly standard trails.
This wouldn't be a bad thing to have on a multi-day hike.
Neither Putin nor Xi are medial experts. They are uneducated fools discussing something they know very little about. They think they are knowledgeable but are not.
100% agree, but that's not what makes this exchange interesting.
They have a reputation for being technocrats. This shows that, at least in the medical domain, they're still just uneducated fools.
It's also telling that two old dictators are bonding over extending lifespans.
The research was done on 12,000 Brazilian civil servants. Some used artificial sweeteners, and some didn't. Those who didn't are the control.
It isn't a perfect "gold standard" double-blind experiment, but a 62% difference in cognitive decline between the two groups is hard to hand-wave away by nitpicking about methodology.
The association is real, but not necessarily the outcome. I couldn't see the full study but couldn't see any mention of BMI. Midlife obesity is associated with cognitive aging. If overweight civil servants were consuming artificial sweeteners in an attempt to lose weight then that could be the source of your associate right there.
It's sex with somebody you love.
If we could all be so lucky.
Then we also have cases of women being more picky these days. The search for perfection is one of the problems.
Is that really true though? I've seen men of all types with girlfriends. But for any woman with a few extra pounds, much less actual obesity, they're very often single.
It seems to be the problem isn't women being picky, it's the hordes of guys who don't want to settle for anything but a hot intelligent women with a great personality.
You know, the difference between this company and the Titanic is that the Titanic had paying customers.