Heck, if I invented a serum that fixed Alz, I'd sure as shit be ready to commercialize it.

Thank you.

Can you provide the source of your quote?

Your TWZ was written in 2019, and is kind of out of date. The USNI article is recent and does talk about delays to the JFK (the next Ford-class carrier), but due to the aircraft elevators and arresting gear, not the launcher.

On the other hand, both those articles are "better" than the AI slop in TFS's last link.

I'm pretty sure you mean the Western Pacific unless you have a very different expectation of China's near-term ambitions than I do.

Mod parent informative. I also appreciate the clarification of "still-standing" theories downthread.

Sorry about the anon Yo Mama joke. I just couldn't resist. ;-)

True, but as the OP was asking about being treated differently on a single criterion, perhaps they hadn't noticed that something very similar had already been tried.

No, and I agree Occam says that's the best explanation.

You, sir, are a gentleman and a scholar.

Did you read the article? They tested an identical email with the link target going to ActBlue versus WinRed.

Receive our emails, even if people mark them as spam. Otherwise, get sued.

Calyx threw in the towel.

404 Media had a sign-in to see the article. Columbia has a Cloudflare AI blocker, but here's their link: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.engineering.columb...

The ArXiv article shows no items in front of any other items, and they ran this experiment in a radio quiet room. How does that suggest that this technique can find buried objects? I'm not saying it can't, but I don't think that was demonstrated here.

+1 Insightful

I object to the notion that there's a "right" set of people to kill off.