Mod parent informative. I also appreciate the clarification of "still-standing" theories downthread.

Sorry about the anon Yo Mama joke. I just couldn't resist. ;-)

True, but as the OP was asking about being treated differently on a single criterion, perhaps they hadn't noticed that something very similar had already been tried.

No, and I agree Occam says that's the best explanation.

You, sir, are a gentleman and a scholar.

Did you read the article? They tested an identical email with the link target going to ActBlue versus WinRed.

Receive our emails, even if people mark them as spam. Otherwise, get sued.

Calyx threw in the towel.

404 Media had a sign-in to see the article. Columbia has a Cloudflare AI blocker, but here's their link: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.engineering.columb...

The ArXiv article shows no items in front of any other items, and they ran this experiment in a radio quiet room. How does that suggest that this technique can find buried objects? I'm not saying it can't, but I don't think that was demonstrated here.

+1 Insightful

I object to the notion that there's a "right" set of people to kill off.

Can't tell if you're trolling or lazy, but presidents were elected in 2016 and 2020, not in 2018.

Maybe you should study some history. It wasn't that long ago.

Exactly. If this is "geostationary orbit" (which makes sense: you want to always be able to beam to your power station), the satellite has to be over the equator. And since Japan isn't on the equator, the beam needs to be able to point far enough afield to zap the Japanese power station. Which can obviously also zap things near Japan's longitude anywhere closer to the equator than Japan, like say, almost all of China.

I actually appreciate this, but the only thing I like about it is the changelog link, and frankly I'd prefer if it just loaded the changelog directly.

If I understand correctly, Google Analytics adds a first party cookie.

I would not consider it a new word so much as an archaic one.