Comment Re:It all depends on detection... (Score 4, Interesting) 264
A vehicle placed at Venus's orbit, though, would be able to see those potentially dangerous asteroids quite well.
A vehicle placed at Venus's orbit, though, would be able to see those potentially dangerous asteroids quite well.
I strongly suspect that this isn't about getting Flash added to mobile safari. Adobe may not like that; but it is basically a lost cause for them, and they know it.
This is about the fact that Apple is forbidding the creation of applications using any intermediate language, even if they are programmatically crunched down into native apps by the time they show up on Apple's doorstep.
It's the difference between Microsoft saying "No, we have no interest in shipping our OS with Quicktime installed" and saying "Only software written in C# with Visual Studio may run on Windows". Not a small distinction.
I can't wait until we can buy a Toyota and install Mercedes software on it.
Oh, wait, your analogy was flawed. Microsoft doesn't make hardware. Ooops. Maybe we should let Toyota continue to be "closed" and we can choose to buy a Toyota or not...just like you can choose to buy a BB or iPhone or Android and those manufacturers can define what will and won't run on their hardware.
Tier One/Space Ship One traveled suborbitally. The Space Shuttle (STS) is an orbiter. The difference? SSO travels at Mach 3. STS hits Mach 25.
SSO flights take 3 people suborbitally. STS takes 7. Which is more important when you consider:
SSO flights take dozens of minutes. The STS can be up for 16+ days. It has to carry food, water, and process wastes for that length of time.
Space Ship One carries essentially no cargo. The Space Shuttle takes 25 metric tons to orbit.
Space Ship One is a suborbital craft. It is not a true space ship, despite its name. It would likely require multiple orders of magnitude more than $30M before it could orbit the planet.
My point was that my time is very valuable, especially my time off from work. I don't have to spend time to shop for new parts, installing them, maintaining, virus checking, etc., etc....and that's worth $500 to me. If you include your time, I'll bet that you spent more than $500 keeping that XP machine running.
Some people value money over time, some people value time over money. That's a place where Ballmer doesn't seem to look--why ARE people willing to spend $500 more for a machine? People don't really throw that sort of money away for a logo, no matter what he or you think. They believe that they are getting at least that much more value out of the system, or they wouldn't pay for it. It's probably true that some folks see value in the logo--I sure don't--but I do see value in both the reliability and longevity of the system, and the "turnkey" sort of nature to it.
Vista and my iPhone convinced me to try out an iMac. I'm never going back. This thing is GREAT. Worst problem that I've had was solved in less than an hour. I just had to fight viruses on my PC, I gave up and did a full reinstall...probably took me a total of 14 hours, and it's not the first time I've had to do stuff like that.
I suppose the question of value depends on how much you value your time...I value mine quite a lot, that $500 is a real bargain to save 14 hours once or twice in the computer's lifetime.
That $500 is a bargain, especially when you consider the time it takes to transfer all the programs over to a new system...
I spent about ten hours last weekend trying to repair a virus infestation. I finally gave up, so I then spent 4 more hours reinstalling the OS and all the programs I normally use.
I earn a bit more than $50 an hour, so I would have saved way more than $500 worth of my time had that PC been a Mac.
Even if the Mac had been infested, just stick the OS disk in, reformat the drive, open Time Machine, and drag my personal files onto the computer. Done in an hour or so.
Physics is a subset of philosophy.
No, it's really not.
Yes, it really is. There's a reason that almost all nonmedical doctorate degrees carry the same title: Doctor of Philosophy. In its highest form, all human knowledge is similar--it requires human thought, and as such is inherently philosophy.
Asynchronous inputs are at the root of our race problems. -- D. Winker and F. Prosser