
Journal pudge's Journal: Reagan Did Not Help 9
In The Colbert Report's "The Word" segment Monday, Colbert mentioned Joe McCarthy "singehandedly mak[ing] a list of which Hollywood liberals we should get rid of." That got a laugh. Then the caption came up, "Well, Reagan Helped." Which got a bigger laugh, and some clapping.
Except, of course, there is no truth of any kind to it. Reagan testified about the problem of communism in Hollywood, but absolutely refused to name names, and it's pathetic that so many people don't know their history.
There should be an intelligence test to get into the audience for TDS and TCR. That joke, among educated people, would have bombed. Or maybe it's the writers who need intelligence testing
they laughed . . . at a lie! (Score:1)
There should be an intelligence test to get into the audience for TDS and TCR. That joke, among educated people, would have bombed.
Firstly, intelligent and educated are not the same thing. Many very intelligent people have know idea what Reagan said to the House Committee on Un-American Activities.
Secondly, a joke does not have to be factually accurate to be funny. On the contrary, that particular joke could be considered funny because it overstates Reagan's part in list-making.
Thirdly, a joke doe
Re:they laughed . . . at a lie! (Score:2)
And an intelligent person would have thought, then, "huh, what did he say?," and not assumed the implication was accurate.
Secondly, a joke does not have to be factually accurate to be funny. On the contrary, that particular joke could be considered funny because it overstates Reagan's part in list-making.
It wasn't.
Thirdly, a joke does not hav
secret snitching is still snitching (Score:1)
Re:secret snitching is still snitching (Score:2)
Yeah, that's what some people say, but all the other records say differently.
And over the years, the new documents show, Reagan's contacts with the bureau were far more extensive than he acknowledged or has been reported.
Yeah, believe the "new" doc
Re:secret snitching is still snitching (Score:1)
Do you know the story about the two versions of those documents [washingtonpost.com]?
Re:secret snitching is still snitching (Score:2)
As much as can be known, which is very little. We don't really know much about the documents in question beyond them being quashed for years.
But you think you know so much: which document claims Reagan named names? What, exactly, does that document say?
But the records obtained by the Chronicle reveal who it was that Reagan and his first wife, Jane Wyman, named during a 1947 meeting with FBI agents
What "records"? What precisely did they s
Re:secret snitching is still snitching (Score:1)
Re:secret snitching is still snitching (Score:2)
Re:secret snitching is still snitching (Score:4, Informative)
By the way... Howard Da Silva *WAS* a communist.