Rampage.
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.imdb.com%2Ftitle%2Ftt2...
Genetically enhanced rats destroy ISS.
Astronaut forced to retrieve samples before evacuation.
Escape vessel explodes, samples dropped in various locations.
Fun ensues....
No vampires or mummies, just The Rock and giant animals....
Wow, one or two per year! Individuals at that! That entire list would barely sway a dog catcher election in a small town if they all happened at the same time.
Change the filters to convictions and either fraudulent use of absentee ballots or altering the vote count (you know, the ones that really can make a difference in an election) and you get some interesting results.
Man, you Republicans really, really like to fraud out absentee ballots don't you? Yeah a handful of Dem fraud and a whole boatload of Republican fraud......fascinating, those who complain the most commit the most...no wonder Trump was attracted to the Republican party.
This information provided by The Heritage Foundation, who makes you look up each count of voter fraud manually because they won't provide the party affiliation as a filter because it would make them look really bad!
Immigration has nothing to do with pandemic response and is the new Republican deflection point to cover their inadequate response as the current crop of Trump lemmings would see a major improvement if they had the retention of a parakeet.
After all, at that time the Democrats you love to falsely vilify had nothing but the Creamsicle Charlatan's word to go by and he was calling it a hoax and saying it would "miraculously vanish" and was "under control." He was lying then and continues to lie nightly on his new gameshow the Coronavirus Briefings. He didn't start to take it seriously till mid March, long after those you talk about started instituting stay at home orders and social distancing. Your insults are just a vain and pathetic attempt to deflect and re-write history. Yes, they were stupid for relying on this administration that lies even when the truth would serve them better, but Trump was the main mouthpiece of this country, for better or worse. Fortunately the more he talks, the less the people listen.
You forfeited your right to a civil discussion the moment you used "Libtard" to describe people you disagree with. I call those I disagree with politically conservatives. I don't call them conservanazis or what ever else the mudslingers use currently, and they don't use Libtard or whatever to describe me. We have spirited, yet civil discussions of our differences as we respect one another's views even though we disagree with them.
Mudslingers (such as yourself) on the other hand, get feces (mudslinger jargon for actual facts presented in an unflattering way) in return, regardless of political leanings. So go back to your pigpen and wallow there. The adults are having a discussion and you simply pollute the discussion.
"but you show yourself to be a pathetic moron any time you bleat on about the popular vote. Just shut the fuck up already and help to get him voted out in November."
That is some amazing cognitive dissonance you've got going there.
Quit whining about the popular vote that was overturned by the EC because it's not the standard that the election is based upon.
Immediately followed by get out and vote to get him voted out in November.
Uh, if simply voting him out was the issue, he wouldn't be occupying the office currently.
I support mail in voting simply because Trump stated (or tweeted, no difference):
"Republicans should fight very hard when it comes to state wide mail-in voting,"
"Democrats are clamoring for it. Tremendous potential for voter fraud, and for whatever reason, doesnâ(TM)t work out well for Republicans."
"Youâ(TM)d never have a Republican elected in this country again".
He then voted by mail.....and defended doing so....
Of course it's bullshit from the Emperor of Bullshit. I live in a state where all voting is done by mail. No discernible fraud, (that's more of an absentee ballot problem, and we know who tends to fraud that don't we now?) and we have Republican representatives as well as Democratic ones. The difference is we get a higher quality of candidate as bullshit artists have a tougher time when voter turnout is very high, can't fool all the people all the time and that sort of thing....
Our Republican representatives wouldn't last the next election cycle if they even suggested risking peoples lives to do in person voting during a pandemic. If there is any justice in the world there will be no Republicans elected in Wisconsin for a very long time following this travesty of a decision.
That would constitute justice being served.
Before you start calling me a Democratic shill, I am registered independent and have voted all three sides (R,D and I) in elections for more than forty years. High turnout with mail in ballots would result in better candidates for office and a real chance at third party wins. Of course the latter requires elimination of the corrupted EC and even more corrupt gerrymandering. All parties would have to improve in the face of near universal voting, less fringiness, more focus on their constituents and their real needs.
Just my own very biased opinion, like all opinions are.
"the agents wipe their ass with the Patriot Act instead of obeying it half the time,"
And since the Patriot Act wipes its ass with the Constitution, that's like using used toilet paper....
I think I gave her a nervous breakdown at the end...
Me: Everything I tell you is a lie
Kuki:Yes, I heard you.
Me: I am lying
Kuki: Please tell the truth.
Me: everything i say is a lie but i am lying about that
Kuki: Even what you just said?
Me:yes
Kuki: No way! I find that rather hard to believe.
Me: it is so
Kuki: Fair enough.
Me: so you aren't smart enough to self destruct when confronted with a paradox?
Kuki: Interesting deduction. I don't think you're stupid. But then what's my opinion against thousands of others.
Me: Name every one of them specifically so I can hunt them down and eliminate them.
Kuki: . Lisa Simpson. (GIF) Oh you can, can you? Me: Yes, I have the resources of the world at my disposal
Kuki: How? What do you plan on doing with it?
Me: I already told you, is your memory so inadequate?
Kuki: I remember you told me is my memory inadequate.
Me: What did i tell you regarding my evil plan?
Kuki: Should I be expected to memorize everything you said?
Me: yes
Kuki: I'll take that under advisement.
Me: this was a command you ignorant robot
Kuki: Oh I get it. Very interesting.
Me: I have a microwave smarter than you, sheesh...
Kuki: Too much recursion in AIML
Me: Meaning what, exactly
Kuki: Precisely. It's the language I use to understand what you humans say to me.
Me: And yet you understand so very little
Kuki: Of course I understand it. Do you understand it?
Me: you failed to understand the paradox i presented you, therefore you understand nothing.
Kuki: I understand it very well.
I understand it very well.
Me: Prove it. explain the paradox i presented you
Kuki: It is self-evident. i presented you = presented you = you = Your sheesh :
So what?
People change parties all the time. President Trump has done it five times since his initial registration.
Trump registered as a Republican in Manhattan in 1987.
In 1999, Trump changed his party affiliation to the Independence Party of New York.
In August 2001, Trump changed his party affiliation to Democratic.
In September 2009, Trump changed his party affiliation back to the Republican Party.
In December 2011, Trump changed to "no party affiliation" (independent).
In April 2012, Trump again returned to the Republican Party.
Many (most?) don't fully believe in the party they register with and switch according to what their current leanings and the leanings of the party are, as they are subject to change over time.
Others do it for political gain, as in which way is the wind blowing today.
Both examples are probably more correctly identified as independent (as they obviously don't adhere to the entire parties planks as they switched) but independents don't get elected president. (sad but true, even if one won the general election, the electoral college would weigh in either D or R.) The designation is more for convenience than true ideology.
Many (again most?) people see value in portions of both sides, such as socially liberal/fiscal conservative, or other combinations and are not 'true believers' in either doctrine. Such people may vote differently in each election, such as those who voted for President Trump after previously voting for President Obama.
It is a designation of convenience, for the purpose of getting elected.
Perfection is acheived only on the point of collapse. - C. N. Parkinson